[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20210119220653.677750-1-alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2021 23:06:39 +0100
From: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>
To: Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@...ertech.it>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>
Cc: linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 01/14] rtc: ac100: use rtc_lock/rtc_unlock
Avoid accessing directly rtc->ops_lock and use the RTC core helpers.
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>
---
drivers/rtc/rtc-ac100.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-ac100.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-ac100.c
index 1ddbef99e38f..92f690542ad2 100644
--- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-ac100.c
+++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-ac100.c
@@ -528,7 +528,7 @@ static irqreturn_t ac100_rtc_irq(int irq, void *data)
unsigned int val = 0;
int ret;
- mutex_lock(&chip->rtc->ops_lock);
+ rtc_lock(&chip->rtc);
/* read status */
ret = regmap_read(regmap, AC100_ALM_INT_STA, &val);
@@ -551,7 +551,7 @@ static irqreturn_t ac100_rtc_irq(int irq, void *data)
}
out:
- mutex_unlock(&chip->rtc->ops_lock);
+ rtc_unlock(&chip->rtc);
return IRQ_HANDLED;
}
--
2.29.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists