linux-kernel - Re: [STABLE BACKPORT 4.4.y, 4.9.y and 4.14.y] compiler.h: Raise minimum version of GCC to 5.1 for arm64

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAKwvOdmShphZV96PjaHbUW17mKhhRi_X0AZotryKmiGVKyiQyw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 19 Jan 2021 14:15:43 -0800
From:   Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>
To:     Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
        Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>
Cc:     "# 3.4.x" <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@...il.com>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>,
        Florian Weimer <fweimer@...hat.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Caroline Tice <cmtice@...gle.com>,
        Luis Lozano <llozano@...gle.com>,
        Stephen Hines <srhines@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [STABLE BACKPORT 4.4.y, 4.9.y and 4.14.y] compiler.h: Raise
 minimum version of GCC to 5.1 for arm64

On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 5:54 AM Will Deacon <will@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> commit dca5244d2f5b94f1809f0c02a549edf41ccd5493 upstream.
>
> GCC versions >= 4.9 and < 5.1 have been shown to emit memory references
> beyond the stack pointer, resulting in memory corruption if an interrupt
> is taken after the stack pointer has been adjusted but before the
> reference has been executed. This leads to subtle, infrequent data
> corruption such as the EXT4 problems reported by Russell King at the
> link below.
>
> Life is too short for buggy compilers, so raise the minimum GCC version
> required by arm64 to 5.1.
>
> Reported-by: Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>
> Suggested-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
> Tested-by: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@...il.com>
> Reviewed-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>
> Reviewed-by: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@...il.com>
> Acked-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
> Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org> # 4.4.y, 4.9.y and 4.14.y only
> Cc: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
> Cc: Florian Weimer <fweimer@...hat.com>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210105154726.GD1551@shell.armlinux.org.uk
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210112224832.10980-1-will@kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
> [will: backport to 4.4.y/4.9.y/4.14.y]

Merging this from stable into "Android Common Kernel" trees that were
built with AOSP GCC 4.9, I expect this to break some builds.  Arnd,
IIRC did you mention that AOSP GCC had picked up a fix?  If so, did
you verify that via disassembly, or gerrit patch file?

(AOSP GCC 4.9: https://android.googlesource.com/platform/prebuilts/gcc/linux-x86/aarch64/aarch64-linux-android-4.9/
master branch, roll back a few commits).
It looks like AOSP GCC `#defines __android__ 1`.

I'm not arguing against a backport, just trying to think through how
we'll need to sort this out downstream.  (Revert or patch on top that
checks for __android__, if AOSP GCC does in fact have a fix.)

> Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
> ---
>  include/linux/compiler-gcc.h | 6 ++++++
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/compiler-gcc.h b/include/linux/compiler-gcc.h
> index af8b4a879934..3cc8adede67b 100644
> --- a/include/linux/compiler-gcc.h
> +++ b/include/linux/compiler-gcc.h
> @@ -145,6 +145,12 @@
>
>  #if GCC_VERSION < 30200
>  # error Sorry, your compiler is too old - please upgrade it.
> +#elif defined(CONFIG_ARM64) && GCC_VERSION < 50100
> +/*
> + * https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63293
> + * https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210107111841.GN1551@shell.armlinux.org.uk
> + */
> +# error Sorry, your version of GCC is too old - please use 5.1 or newer.
>  #endif
>
>  #if GCC_VERSION < 30300
> --
> 2.30.0.284.gd98b1dd5eaa7-goog
>


-- 
Thanks,
~Nick Desaulniers