[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20210119220653.677750-3-alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2021 23:06:41 +0100
From: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>
To: Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@...ertech.it>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>
Cc: linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 03/14] rtc: ds1305: use rtc_lock/rtc_unlock
Avoid accessing directly rtc->ops_lock and use the RTC core helpers.
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>
---
drivers/rtc/rtc-ds1305.c | 5 ++---
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-ds1305.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-ds1305.c
index 8c2ab29c3d91..9ef107b99b65 100644
--- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-ds1305.c
+++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-ds1305.c
@@ -435,13 +435,12 @@ static const struct rtc_class_ops ds1305_ops = {
static void ds1305_work(struct work_struct *work)
{
struct ds1305 *ds1305 = container_of(work, struct ds1305, work);
- struct mutex *lock = &ds1305->rtc->ops_lock;
struct spi_device *spi = ds1305->spi;
u8 buf[3];
int status;
/* lock to protect ds1305->ctrl */
- mutex_lock(lock);
+ rtc_lock(ds1305->rtc);
/* Disable the IRQ, and clear its status ... for now, we "know"
* that if more than one alarm is active, they're in sync.
@@ -459,7 +458,7 @@ static void ds1305_work(struct work_struct *work)
if (status < 0)
dev_dbg(&spi->dev, "clear irq --> %d\n", status);
- mutex_unlock(lock);
+ rtc_unlock(ds1305->rtc);
if (!test_bit(FLAG_EXITING, &ds1305->flags))
enable_irq(spi->irq);
--
2.29.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists