lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKMK7uGrdDrbtj0OyzqQc0CGrQwc2F3tFJU9vLfm2jjufAZ5YQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 19 Jan 2021 09:17:55 +0100
From:   Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>
To:     DRI Development <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc:     KVM list <kvm@...r.kernel.org>, Linux MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        linux-samsung-soc <linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
        "open list:DMA BUFFER SHARING FRAMEWORK" 
        <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
        Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...el.com>,
        Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>,
        Jérôme Glisse <jglisse@...hat.com>,
        Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Linux PCI <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 12/17] PCI: Revoke mappings like devmem

On Fri, Nov 27, 2020 at 5:42 PM Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch> wrote:
>
> Since 3234ac664a87 ("/dev/mem: Revoke mappings when a driver claims
> the region") /dev/kmem zaps ptes when the kernel requests exclusive
> acccess to an iomem region. And with CONFIG_IO_STRICT_DEVMEM, this is
> the default for all driver uses.
>
> Except there's two more ways to access PCI BARs: sysfs and proc mmap
> support. Let's plug that hole.
>
> For revoke_devmem() to work we need to link our vma into the same
> address_space, with consistent vma->vm_pgoff. ->pgoff is already
> adjusted, because that's how (io_)remap_pfn_range works, but for the
> mapping we need to adjust vma->vm_file->f_mapping. The cleanest way is
> to adjust this at at ->open time:
>
> - for sysfs this is easy, now that binary attributes support this. We
>   just set bin_attr->mapping when mmap is supported
> - for procfs it's a bit more tricky, since procfs pci access has only
>   one file per device, and access to a specific resources first needs
>   to be set up with some ioctl calls. But mmap is only supported for
>   the same resources as sysfs exposes with mmap support, and otherwise
>   rejected, so we can set the mapping unconditionally at open time
>   without harm.
>
> A special consideration is for arch_can_pci_mmap_io() - we need to
> make sure that the ->f_mapping doesn't alias between ioport and iomem
> space. There's only 2 ways in-tree to support mmap of ioports: generic
> pci mmap (ARCH_GENERIC_PCI_MMAP_RESOURCE), and sparc as the single
> architecture hand-rolling. Both approach support ioport mmap through a
> special pfn range and not through magic pte attributes. Aliasing is
> therefore not a problem.
>
> The only difference in access checks left is that sysfs PCI mmap does
> not check for CAP_RAWIO. I'm not really sure whether that should be
> added or not.
>
> Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
> Reviewed-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...el.com>
> Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>
> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
> Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
> Cc: John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>
> Cc: Jérôme Glisse <jglisse@...hat.com>
> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
> Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
> Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org
> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
> Cc: linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org
> Cc: linux-media@...r.kernel.org
> Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
> Cc: linux-pci@...r.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>
> --
> v2:
> - Totally new approach: Adjust filp->f_mapping at open time. Note that
>   this now works on all architectures, not just those support
>   ARCH_GENERIC_PCI_MMAP_RESOURCE
> ---
>  drivers/pci/pci-sysfs.c | 4 ++++
>  drivers/pci/proc.c      | 1 +
>  2 files changed, 5 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci-sysfs.c b/drivers/pci/pci-sysfs.c
> index d15c881e2e7e..3f1c31bc0b7c 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/pci-sysfs.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/pci-sysfs.c
> @@ -929,6 +929,7 @@ void pci_create_legacy_files(struct pci_bus *b)
>         b->legacy_io->read = pci_read_legacy_io;
>         b->legacy_io->write = pci_write_legacy_io;
>         b->legacy_io->mmap = pci_mmap_legacy_io;
> +       b->legacy_io->mapping = iomem_get_mapping();
>         pci_adjust_legacy_attr(b, pci_mmap_io);
>         error = device_create_bin_file(&b->dev, b->legacy_io);
>         if (error)
> @@ -941,6 +942,7 @@ void pci_create_legacy_files(struct pci_bus *b)
>         b->legacy_mem->size = 1024*1024;
>         b->legacy_mem->attr.mode = 0600;
>         b->legacy_mem->mmap = pci_mmap_legacy_mem;
> +       b->legacy_io->mapping = iomem_get_mapping();

Unlike the normal pci stuff below, the legacy files here go boom
because they're set up much earlier in the boot sequence. This only
affects HAVE_PCI_LEGACY architectures, which aren't that many. So what
should we do here now:
- drop the devmem revoke for these
- rework the init sequence somehow to set up these files a lot later
- redo the sysfs patch so that it doesn't take an address_space
pointer, but instead a callback to get at that (since at open time
everything is set up). Imo rather ugly
- ditch this part of the series (since there's not really any takers
for the latter parts it might just not make sense to push for this)
- something else?

Bjorn, Greg, thoughts?

Issuge got reported by Stephen on a powerpc when trying to build
linux-next with this patch included.

Thanks, Daniel

>         pci_adjust_legacy_attr(b, pci_mmap_mem);
>         error = device_create_bin_file(&b->dev, b->legacy_mem);
>         if (error)
> @@ -1156,6 +1158,8 @@ static int pci_create_attr(struct pci_dev *pdev, int num, int write_combine)
>                         res_attr->mmap = pci_mmap_resource_uc;
>                 }
>         }
> +       if (res_attr->mmap)
> +               res_attr->mapping = iomem_get_mapping();
>         res_attr->attr.name = res_attr_name;
>         res_attr->attr.mode = 0600;
>         res_attr->size = pci_resource_len(pdev, num);
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/proc.c b/drivers/pci/proc.c
> index 3a2f90beb4cb..9bab07302bbf 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/proc.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/proc.c
> @@ -298,6 +298,7 @@ static int proc_bus_pci_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
>         fpriv->write_combine = 0;
>
>         file->private_data = fpriv;
> +       file->f_mapping = iomem_get_mapping();
>
>         return 0;
>  }
> --
> 2.29.2
>


-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ