linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] PCI: rockchip: Make 'ep-gpios' DT property optional

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <12687142.y0N7aAr316@diego>
Date:   Tue, 19 Jan 2021 10:11:01 +0100
From:   Heiko Stübner <heiko@...ech.de>
To:     Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@...k-chips.com>,
        Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
        Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
        Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...nel.org>
Cc:     Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>, Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
        Johan Jonker <jbx6244@...il.com>, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] PCI: rockchip: Make 'ep-gpios' DT property optional

Am Mittwoch, 6. Januar 2021, 14:46:14 CET schrieb Chen-Yu Tsai:
> From: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>
> 
> The Rockchip PCIe controller DT binding clearly states that 'ep-gpios' is
> an optional property. And indeed there are boards that don't require it.
> 
> Make the driver follow the binding by using devm_gpiod_get_optional()
> instead of devm_gpiod_get().
> 
> Fixes: e77f847df54c ("PCI: rockchip: Add Rockchip PCIe controller support")
> Fixes: 956cd99b35a8 ("PCI: rockchip: Separate common code from RC driver")
> Fixes: 964bac9455be ("PCI: rockchip: Split out rockchip_pcie_parse_dt() to parse DT")
> Signed-off-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>
> ---
> Heiko, I dropped you reviewed-by due to the error message change
> 
> Changes since v2:
>   - Fix error message for failed GPIO
> 
> Changes since v1:
>   - Rewrite subject to match existing convention and reference
>     'ep-gpios' DT property instead of the 'ep_gpio' field
> ---
>  drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rockchip.c | 5 +++--
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rockchip.c b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rockchip.c
> index 904dec0d3a88..90c957e3bc73 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rockchip.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rockchip.c
> @@ -118,9 +118,10 @@ int rockchip_pcie_parse_dt(struct rockchip_pcie *rockchip)
>  	}
>  
>  	if (rockchip->is_rc) {
> -		rockchip->ep_gpio = devm_gpiod_get(dev, "ep", GPIOD_OUT_HIGH);
> +		rockchip->ep_gpio = devm_gpiod_get_optional(dev, "ep", GPIOD_OUT_HIGH);
>  		if (IS_ERR(rockchip->ep_gpio)) {
> -			dev_err(dev, "missing ep-gpios property in node\n");
> +			dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(rockchip->ep_gpio),
> +				      "failed to get ep GPIO\n");
>  			return PTR_ERR(rockchip->ep_gpio);

looking at [0] shouldn't that be just
	return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(.....)...);
instead of dev_err_probe + additional return?

Heiko

[0] https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/latest/source/drivers/base/core.c#L4223

>  		}
>  	}
>