[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6fc14c85-030a-1722-0abe-083fba556485@suse.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2021 11:46:50 +0100
From: Jürgen Groß <jgross@...e.com>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 3/8] static_call: Pull some static_call declarations
to the type headers
On 18.01.21 15:12, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
>
> Some static call declarations are going to be needed on low level header
> files. Move the necessary material to the dedicated static call types
> header to avoid inclusion dependency hell.
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
> Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...nel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>
Could the patches please be reordered to have this one first in the
series? I could make use of it in my paravirt simplification series.
I'll include this patch (in slightly modified form. i.e. without the
__static_call_return0() parts) in my series in order to make it
build.
My tests suggest you should also update
tools/include/linux/static_call_types.h
Juergen
Download attachment "OpenPGP_0xB0DE9DD628BF132F.asc" of type "application/pgp-keys" (3092 bytes)
Download attachment "OpenPGP_signature" of type "application/pgp-signature" (496 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists