linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 0/5] Scan for an idle sibling in a single pass

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 19 Jan 2021 12:02:20 +0000
From:   Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>
To:     Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
Cc:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Li Aubrey <aubrey.li@...ux.intel.com>,
        Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@....com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/5] Scan for an idle sibling in a single pass

On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 12:33:04PM +0100, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Jan 2021 at 12:22, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net> wrote:
> >
> > Changelog since v2
> > o Remove unnecessary parameters
> > o Update nr during scan only when scanning for cpus
> 
> Hi Mel,
> 
> I haven't looked at your previous version mainly because I'm chasing a
> performance regression on v5.11-rcx which prevents me from testing the
> impact of your patchset on my !SMT2 system.
> Will do this as soon as this problem is fixed
> 

Thanks, that would be appreciated as I do not have access to a !SMT2
system to do my own evaluation.

-- 
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs