linux-kernel - Re: [RESEND PATCH v3 2/2] i2c: i2c-mux-gpio: Enable this driver in ACPI land

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 19 Jan 2021 14:10:15 +0200
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Peter Rosin <peda@...ntia.se>
Cc:     Wolfram Sang <wsa@...nel.org>, Evan Green <evgreen@...omium.org>,
        Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
        Peter Korsgaard <peter.korsgaard@...co.com>,
        linux-i2c <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v3 2/2] i2c: i2c-mux-gpio: Enable this driver in
 ACPI land

On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 10:29:46AM +0100, Peter Rosin wrote:
> On 2021-01-14 20:53, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> >> Can this be accepted as-is, or should I resend?
> > 
> > Peter, can you have a look here as well?
> 
> I have no issues, but I was waiting for a response from Andy here. I have
> little knowledge of ACPI, and have previously made ignorant mistakes in
> that area. I would greatly appreciate Andy following through with his
> line of thinking...
> 
> So, if we ignore Andys review comments, then:
> 
> Acked-by: Peter Rosin <peda@...ntia.se>

Sorry guys for me being silent, I have a lot of stuff which makes me under
DDoS-like attack (metaphorically speaking). I'm going to look at this just now.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko