linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 2/7] acpi: utils: Add function to fetch dependent acpi

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 19 Jan 2021 13:28:08 +0000
From:   Daniel Scally <djrscally@...il.com>
To:     "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
Cc:     Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-i2c <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>,
        Platform Driver <platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org>,
        "open list:ACPI COMPONENT ARCHITECTURE (ACPICA)" <devel@...ica.org>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
        Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>, andy@...nel.org,
        Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>,
        Wolfram Sang <wsa@...nel.org>,
        Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
        Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
        Mark Gross <mgross@...ux.intel.com>,
        Robert Moore <robert.moore@...el.com>,
        Erik Kaneda <erik.kaneda@...el.com>,
        Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
        Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
        Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham@...asonboard.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/7] acpi: utils: Add function to fetch dependent
 acpi_devices


On 19/01/2021 13:15, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 9:51 PM Daniel Scally <djrscally@...il.com> wrote:
>> On 18/01/2021 16:14, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 1:37 AM Daniel Scally <djrscally@...il.com> wrote:
>>>> In some ACPI tables we encounter, devices use the _DEP method to assert
>>>> a dependence on other ACPI devices as opposed to the OpRegions that the
>>>> specification intends. We need to be able to find those devices "from"
>>>> the dependee, so add a function to parse all ACPI Devices and check if
>>>> the include the handle of the dependee device in their _DEP buffer.
>>> What exactly do you need this for?
>> So, in our DSDT we have devices with _HID INT3472, plus sensors which
>> refer to those INT3472's in their _DEP method. The driver binds to the
>> INT3472 device, we need to find the sensors dependent on them.
>>
> Well, this is an interesting concept. :-)
>
> Why does _DEP need to be used for that?  Isn't there any other way to
> look up the dependent sensors?


If there is, I'm not aware of it, I don't see a reference to the sensor
in the INT3472 device (named "PMI0", with the corresponding sensor being
"CAM0") in DSDT  [1]

>>> Would it be practical to look up the suppliers in acpi_dep_list instead?
>>>
>>> Note that supplier drivers may remove entries from there, but does
>>> that matter for your use case?
>> Ah - that may work, yes. Thank you, let me test that.
> Even if that doesn't work right away, but it can be made work, I would
> very much prefer that to the driver parsing _DEP for every device in
> the namespace by itself.


Alright; I haven't looked too closely yet, but I think an iterator over
acpi_dep_list exported from the ACPI subsystem would also work in a
pretty similar way to the function introduced in this patch does,
without much work


[1]
https://gist.githubusercontent.com/djrscally/e64d112180517352fa3392878b0f4a7d/raw/88b90b3ea4204fd7845257b6666fdade47cc2981/dsdt.dsl