[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210119153350.GM27433@zn.tnic>
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2021 16:33:50 +0100
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Feng Tang <feng.tang@...el.com>
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
kernel test robot <oliver.sang@...el.com>,
Jonathan Lemon <bsd@...com>, Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, x86@...nel.org,
lkp@...ts.01.org, lkp@...el.com, ying.huang@...el.com,
zhengjun.xing@...el.com
Subject: Re: [x86/mce] 7bb39313cd: netperf.Throughput_tps -4.5% regression
On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 11:09:03PM +0800, Feng Tang wrote:
> Yes, that can happen. I started a 4 tasks netperf on a 4C/8T KBL desktop,
> and also saw around 2% improvement. Both the kernel config and the
> platform matters.
Oh great. ;-\
> For the performance changes I have checked, sometimes the change can be
> reproduced on platforms of different generations (the exact delta number
> may differs), sometimes it can only be reproduced on one specific platform,
> like some old generation, or special one like Xeon Phi.
Probably because that Xeon Phi thing is not as powerful cache-wise as
some newer ones which have bigger caches and smarter hw prefetchers,
etc.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
Powered by blists - more mailing lists