[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAM9d7chk5qC7er5EVmmrHZtP2PB6Y9EikfGYxYibE4HZpCOmbQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2021 12:11:58 +0900
From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
To: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>,
Alexey Alexandrov <aalexand@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf/core: Emit PERF_RECORD_LOST for pinned events
Hi Andi,
On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 11:47 AM Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
>
> > > I don't think I object to having an even in the stream, but your LOST
> > > event is unfortunate in that it itself can get lost when there's no
> > > space in the buffer (which arguably is unlikely, but still).
> > >
> > > So from that point of view, I think overloading LOST is not so very nice
> > > for this.
> >
> > But anything can get lost in case of no space.
> > Do you want to use something other than the LOST event?
>
> Could always reserve the last entry in the ring buffer for a LOST event,
> that would guarantee you can always get one out.
A problem is that we can have more than one event that failed.
In my understanding, we keep the lost count and add a LOST event
when there's a space later. So probably we can keep a list of the
failed events and do similar for each event. Or just use a single
event to notify some number of events were failed.
Thanks,
Namhyung
Powered by blists - more mailing lists