[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALvZod4BjRx1PRhkR0_MCF6Hnixie2t=8RHx+5s1DikSw66Dfw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2021 08:39:28 -0800
From: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com>
To: Feng Tang <feng.tang@...el.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Roman Gushchin <guro@...com>, Linux MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mm: page_counter: relayout structure to reduce false sharing
On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 11:20 PM Feng Tang <feng.tang@...el.com> wrote:
>
> When checking a memory cgroup related performance regression [1],
> from the perf c2c profiling data, we found high false sharing for
> accessing 'usage' and 'parent'.
>
> On 64 bit system, the 'usage' and 'parent' are close to each other,
> and easy to be in one cacheline (for cacheline size == 64+ B). 'usage'
> is usally written, while 'parent' is usually read as the cgroup's
> hierarchical counting nature.
>
> So move the 'parent' to the end of the structure to make sure they
> are in different cache lines.
>
> Following are some performance data with the patch, against
> v5.11-rc1. [ In the data, A means a platform with 2 sockets 48C/96T,
> B is a platform of 4 sockests 72C/144T, and if a %stddev will be
> shown bigger than 2%, P100/P50 means number of test tasks equals
> to 100%/50% of nr_cpu]
>
> will-it-scale/malloc1
> ---------------------
> v5.11-rc1 v5.11-rc1+patch
>
> A-P100 15782 ± 2% -0.1% 15765 ± 3% will-it-scale.per_process_ops
> A-P50 21511 +8.9% 23432 will-it-scale.per_process_ops
> B-P100 9155 +2.2% 9357 will-it-scale.per_process_ops
> B-P50 10967 +7.1% 11751 ± 2% will-it-scale.per_process_ops
>
> will-it-scale/pagefault2
> ------------------------
> v5.11-rc1 v5.11-rc1+patch
>
> A-P100 79028 +3.0% 81411 will-it-scale.per_process_ops
> A-P50 183960 ± 2% +4.4% 192078 ± 2% will-it-scale.per_process_ops
> B-P100 85966 +9.9% 94467 ± 3% will-it-scale.per_process_ops
> B-P50 198195 +9.8% 217526 will-it-scale.per_process_ops
>
> fio (4k/1M is block size)
> -------------------------
> v5.11-rc1 v5.11-rc1+patch
>
> A-P50-r-4k 16881 ± 2% +1.2% 17081 ± 2% fio.read_bw_MBps
> A-P50-w-4k 3931 +4.5% 4111 ± 2% fio.write_bw_MBps
> A-P50-r-1M 15178 -0.2% 15154 fio.read_bw_MBps
> A-P50-w-1M 3924 +0.1% 3929 fio.write_bw_MBps
>
> [1].https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20201102091543.GM31092@shao2-debian/
> Signed-off-by: Feng Tang <feng.tang@...el.com>
> Reviewed-by: Roman Gushchin <guro@...com>
> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>
Reviewed-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists