linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 5/9] firmware: keembay: Add support for Trusted Firmware Service call

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20210119172028.577x72bxv2khmg76@bogus>
Date:   Tue, 19 Jan 2021 17:20:28 +0000
From:   Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
To:     "Zulkifli, Muhammad Husaini" <muhammad.husaini.zulkifli@...el.com>
Cc:     Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@....com>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        "ulf.hansson@...aro.org" <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
        "lgirdwood@...il.com" <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        "robh+dt@...nel.org" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Hunter, Adrian" <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
        "michal.simek@...inx.com" <michal.simek@...inx.com>,
        "linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Shevchenko, Andriy" <andriy.shevchenko@...el.com>,
        "A, Rashmi" <rashmi.a@...el.com>,
        "Vaidya, Mahesh R" <mahesh.r.vaidya@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 5/9] firmware: keembay: Add support for Trusted
 Firmware Service call

On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 02:38:32AM +0000, Zulkifli, Muhammad Husaini wrote:

[...]

> 
> I try to hook up the DT last night. Seems like the SCMI Protocol 17 is not
> implemented at ATF side.

I had guessed that.

> Double check with ATF Team, currently we don't have SCMI voltage domain
> control in ARM Trusted Firmware yet as of now, that is why even if I map the
> function to scmi, my call will be fail.

Correct, but if you already have this custom SMCCC for voltage already
implemented in TF-A, I don't see it is a big deal to support voltage
protocol there.

> 
> [    2.648989] arm-scmi firmware:scmi: SCMI Notifications - Core Enabled.
> [    2.656157] arm-scmi firmware:scmi: SCMI Protocol v1.0 'INTEL:KMB' Firmware version 0x1
> [    2.664513] arm-scmi firmware:scmi: SCMI protocol 23 not implemented
> [    2.675898] arm-scmi firmware:scmi: SCMI protocol 17 not implemented
> 
> Any possibilities that for UHS patch we go with my current regulator driver
> implementation?

Sorry absolutely no. If this platform was not using SCMI, I wouldn't have
pushed back hard on this custom SMCCC. Please update TF-A to add this support.
There is no point in having custom interface just for this when everything
else is already using SCMI on this platform.

-- 
Regards,
Sudeep