lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210119145808.GW2771@vkoul-mobl>
Date:   Tue, 19 Jan 2021 20:28:08 +0530
From:   Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>
To:     Bard Liao <yung-chuan.liao@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     alsa-devel@...a-project.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, jank@...ence.com,
        srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org, rander.wang@...ux.intel.com,
        hui.wang@...onical.com, pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com,
        sanyog.r.kale@...el.com, bard.liao@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] soundwire: fix ACK/NAK handling and improve log

On 15-01-21, 13:37, Bard Liao wrote:
> The existing code reports a NAK only when ACK=0
> This is not aligned with the SoundWire 1.x specifications.
> 
> Table 32 in the SoundWire 1.2 specification shows that a Device shall
> not set NAK=1 if ACK=1. But Table 33 shows the Combined Response
> may very well be NAK=1/ACK=1, e.g. if another Device than the one
> addressed reports a parity error.
> 
> NAK=1 signals a 'Command_Aborted', regardless of the ACK bit value.
> 
> Move the tests for NAK so that the NAK=1/ACK=1 combination is properly
> detected according to the specification.
> 
> Also, improve the demesg log to get more information for debugging.

Applied, thanks

-- 
~Vinod

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ