[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210119145808.GW2771@vkoul-mobl>
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2021 20:28:08 +0530
From: Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>
To: Bard Liao <yung-chuan.liao@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: alsa-devel@...a-project.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, jank@...ence.com,
srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org, rander.wang@...ux.intel.com,
hui.wang@...onical.com, pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com,
sanyog.r.kale@...el.com, bard.liao@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] soundwire: fix ACK/NAK handling and improve log
On 15-01-21, 13:37, Bard Liao wrote:
> The existing code reports a NAK only when ACK=0
> This is not aligned with the SoundWire 1.x specifications.
>
> Table 32 in the SoundWire 1.2 specification shows that a Device shall
> not set NAK=1 if ACK=1. But Table 33 shows the Combined Response
> may very well be NAK=1/ACK=1, e.g. if another Device than the one
> addressed reports a parity error.
>
> NAK=1 signals a 'Command_Aborted', regardless of the ACK bit value.
>
> Move the tests for NAK so that the NAK=1/ACK=1 combination is properly
> detected according to the specification.
>
> Also, improve the demesg log to get more information for debugging.
Applied, thanks
--
~Vinod
Powered by blists - more mailing lists