[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+CK2bDwFuwgNa3mYHTvBJWYTM+gLaeKS4TBYCjqWzag3kEagw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2021 13:27:45 -0500
From: Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@...een.com>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
Oscar Salvador <osalvador@...e.de>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>,
Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@...ux.microsoft.com>,
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>, mike.kravetz@...cle.com,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>,
Linux Doc Mailing List <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 04/14] mm/gup: check for isolation errors
> This should have a fixme too, this is a bug.
OK
>
> The patch looks OK, but I keep feeling this logic is all really
> overcomplicated...
I agree, I have a simplification patch for this logic, check out patch 12/14.
>
> Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
Thank you for your review.
Pasha
Powered by blists - more mailing lists