[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6d4d4a6b-f28c-81db-4e67-2b5b94116fa4@linux.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2021 13:09:38 -0600
From: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>
To: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>,
Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>
Cc: alsa-devel@...a-project.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, sanyog.r.kale@...el.com,
yung-chuan.liao@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] soundwire: debugfs: use controller id instead of link_id
>>>> link_id can be zero and if we have multiple controller instances
>>>> in a system like Qualcomm debugfs will end-up with duplicate namespace
>>>> resulting in incorrect debugfs entries.
>>>>
>>>> Using id should give a unique debugfs directory entry and should fix
>>>> below
>>>> warning too.
>>>> "debugfs: Directory 'master-0' with parent 'soundwire' already
>>>> present!"
>>>
>>> Yeah id is guaranteed to be unique so this will work.
>>>
>>> Applied, thanks
>>
>> This patch is a no-op for Intel, but I am not convinced it's the right
>> fix or the definitions are not consistent.
>
> It depends if the intention is to represent full Hierarchy in debugfs,
> then I agree. Its was consistent even before!
Indeed, we don't currently have a notion of controller in debugfs.
> currently we have
> /sys/kernel/debug/soundwire/master-*
>
> Are you suggesting that we have something like this:
>
> /sys/kernel/debug/soundwire/xyz-controller/master-<LINK-ID> ??
Yes this is what I was thinking about.
> /sys/kernel/debug/soundwire/xyz-controller/master-<LINK-ID>/xyz-slave/master-<LINK-ID>
> ??
This would be for a bridge which to the best of my knowledge hasn't been
implemented by anyone (clocking and command/control timing issues).
> Or may be something much simpler like:
>
> /sys/kernel/debug/soundwire/master-<ID>.<LINK_ID>
the bus->id is an IDA, which is useful for to avoid conflicts, but it's
not really meaningful for debugfs. I remember seeing a case where we had
links 2 and 4 enabled, and the bus->id were 0 and 1, a completely
artificial value that doesn't really help in debugging.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists