[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAAeHK+zKnSdx+=8mA5o1YWR5aV8OSEUaRZiaJiB6wsOo_5kYJQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2021 20:33:28 +0100
From: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...gle.com>
To: Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@....com>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
kasan-dev <kasan-dev@...glegroups.com>,
Leon Romanovsky <leonro@...lanox.com>,
Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@...tuozzo.com>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kasan: Add explicit preconditions to kasan_report()
On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 7:57 PM Vincenzo Frascino
<vincenzo.frascino@....com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 1/19/21 6:52 PM, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 07:27:43PM +0100, Andrey Konovalov wrote:
> >> On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 6:26 PM Vincenzo Frascino
> >> <vincenzo.frascino@....com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> With the introduction of KASAN_HW_TAGS, kasan_report() dereferences
> >>> the address passed as a parameter.
> >>>
> >>> Add a comment to make sure that the preconditions to the function are
> >>> explicitly clarified.
> >>>
> >>> Note: An invalid address (e.g. NULL pointer address) passed to the
> >>> function when, KASAN_HW_TAGS is enabled, leads to a kernel panic.
> >>>
> >>> Cc: Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@...tuozzo.com>
> >>> Cc: Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>
> >>> Cc: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>
> >>> Cc: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@...lanox.com>
> >>> Cc: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...gle.com>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@....com>
> >>> ---
> >>> mm/kasan/report.c | 11 +++++++++++
> >>> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/mm/kasan/report.c b/mm/kasan/report.c
> >>> index c0fb21797550..2485b585004d 100644
> >>> --- a/mm/kasan/report.c
> >>> +++ b/mm/kasan/report.c
> >>> @@ -403,6 +403,17 @@ static void __kasan_report(unsigned long addr, size_t size, bool is_write,
> >>> end_report(&flags);
> >>> }
> >>>
> >>> +/**
> >>> + * kasan_report - report kasan fault details
> >>> + * @addr: valid address of the allocation where the tag fault was detected
> >>> + * @size: size of the allocation where the tag fault was detected
> >>> + * @is_write: the instruction that caused the fault was a read or write?
> >>> + * @ip: pointer to the instruction that cause the fault
> >>> + *
> >>> + * Note: When CONFIG_KASAN_HW_TAGS is enabled kasan_report() dereferences
> >>> + * the address to access the tags, hence it must be valid at this point in
> >>> + * order to not cause a kernel panic.
> >>> + */
> >>
> >> It doesn't dereference the address, it just checks the tags, right?
> >>
> >> Ideally, kasan_report() should survive that with HW_TAGS like with the
> >> other modes. The reason it doesn't is probably because of a blank
> >> addr_has_metadata() definition for HW_TAGS in mm/kasan/kasan.h. I
> >> guess we should somehow check that the memory comes from page_alloc or
> >> kmalloc. Or otherwise make sure that it has tags. Maybe there's an arm
> >> instruction to check whether the memory has tags?
> >
> > There isn't an architected way to probe whether a memory location has a
> > VA->PA mapping. The tags are addressed by PA but you can't reach them if
> > you get a page fault on the VA. So we either document the kasan_report()
> > preconditions or, as you suggest, update addr_has_metadata() for the
> > HW_TAGS case. Something like:
> >
> > return is_vmalloc_addr(virt) || virt_addr_valid(virt));
> >
>
> Or we could have both ;)
Sounds good! Please also update the comment to avoid mentioning tag
faults. kasan_report() is used for the generic KASAN mode as well, and
it doesn't use tags.
Thanks!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists