linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH v2] ASoC: Intel: Skylake: Check the kcontrol against NULL

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 20 Jan 2021 16:45:38 +0000
From:   "Rojewski, Cezary" <cezary.rojewski@...el.com>
To:     Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>,
        Łukasz Majczak <lma@...ihalf.com>
CC:     Marcin Wojtas <mw@...ihalf.com>,
        Liam Girdwood <liam.r.girdwood@...ux.intel.com>,
        Mateusz Gorski <mateusz.gorski@...ux.intel.com>,
        Radoslaw Biernacki <rad@...ihalf.com>,
        "Alex Levin" <levinale@...gle.com>,
        Guenter Roeck <groeck@...gle.com>,
        "alsa-devel@...a-project.org" <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "stable@...r.kernel.org" <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
        Amadeusz Sławiński 
        <amadeuszx.slawinski@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v2] ASoC: Intel: Skylake: Check the kcontrol against NULL

On 2021-01-20 5:41 PM, Rojewski, Cezary wrote:
> 
> Just checked the history behind this. And must say, I liked Ricardo's
> version better. Except for the "= {};" bit which Mark already pointed
> out - it should be a separate fix - it's simply more optional

Meant to say: optimal.