[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ac36cf0fa63442188d2d1458ef6a0eb3@intel.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2021 17:17:25 +0000
From: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
CC: "x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
"Darren Hart" <dvhart@...radead.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-edac@...r.kernel.org" <linux-edac@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v4] x86/mce: Avoid infinite loop for copy from user
recovery
> Yah, some printk sprinkling might be a good start. But debugging in that
> atomic context is always nasty. ;-\
Some very light printk sprinkling (one message in queue_task_work() in atomic
context, one each in kill_me_now() and kill_me_maybe() to check when task_work
actually called them.
Cases 1 & 2 (user & normal copyin) now work just fine (hundreds of iterations).
Case 3 (my futex test) just hangs with only two characters making it to the serial port "[ "
Deeply strange.
-Tony
Powered by blists - more mailing lists