linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH][next] drm/amd/display: Fix spelling mistake of function name

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <a06aeb18-b02d-41cd-f717-6ff30ea48bb4@amd.com>
Date:   Wed, 20 Jan 2021 09:46:45 -0500
From:   Harry Wentland <harry.wentland@....com>
To:     Colin King <colin.king@...onical.com>, Leo Li <sunpeng.li@....com>,
        Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@....com>,
        Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>,
        David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
        Rodrigo Siqueira <Rodrigo.Siqueira@....com>,
        amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org
Cc:     kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH][next] drm/amd/display: Fix spelling mistake of function
 name

On 2021-01-20 4:26 a.m., Colin King wrote:
> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
> 

Reviewed-by: Harry Wentland <harry.wentland@....com>

Harry

> There are two spelling mistakes of the function name, fix this
> by using __func__ instead of a hard coded name string.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
> ---
>   drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/core/dc_link.c | 4 ++--
>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/core/dc_link.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/core/dc_link.c
> index c16af3983fdb..91d4130cd2cb 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/core/dc_link.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/core/dc_link.c
> @@ -1602,7 +1602,7 @@ static bool dc_link_construct(struct dc_link *link,
>   
>   	link->psr_settings.psr_version = DC_PSR_VERSION_UNSUPPORTED;
>   
> -	DC_LOG_DC("BIOS object table - dc_link_contruct finished successfully.\n");
> +	DC_LOG_DC("BIOS object table - %s finished successfully.\n", __func__);
>   	return true;
>   device_tag_fail:
>   	link->link_enc->funcs->destroy(&link->link_enc);
> @@ -1619,7 +1619,7 @@ static bool dc_link_construct(struct dc_link *link,
>   		link->hpd_gpio = NULL;
>   	}
>   
> -	DC_LOG_DC("BIOS object table - dc_link_contruct failed.\n");
> +	DC_LOG_DC("BIOS object table - %s failed.\n", __func__);
>   	kfree(info);
>   
>   	return false;
>