[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YAhuHdcfKnyWKdka@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2021 18:53:33 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: vincent.donnefort@....com
Cc: tglx@...utronix.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
valentin.schneider@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] cpu/hotplug: Add cpuhp_invoke_callback_range()
On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 06:45:16PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 05:10:46PM +0000, vincent.donnefort@....com wrote:
> > @@ -475,6 +478,11 @@ cpuhp_set_state(struct cpuhp_cpu_state *st, enum cpuhp_state target)
> > static inline void
> > cpuhp_reset_state(struct cpuhp_cpu_state *st, enum cpuhp_state prev_state)
> > {
> > + st->target = prev_state;
> > +
> > + if (st->rollback)
> > + return;
>
> I'm thinking that if we call rollback while already rollback we're hosed
> something fierce, no?
>
> That like going up, failing, going back down again, also failing, giving
> up in a fiery death.
Ooh, is this a hack for _cpu_down():
ret = cpuhp_down_callbacks(cpu, st, target);
if (ret && st->state == CPUHP_TEARDOWN_CPU && st->state < prev_state) {
cpuhp_reset_state(st, prev_state);
__cpuhp_kick_ap(st);
}
Where cpuhp_down_callbacks() can already have called cpuhp_reset_state() ?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists