linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] init/gcov: allow CONFIG_CONSTRUCTORS on UML to fix module gcov

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <34643068c072c185cc9a65f2c3e643be5169136d.camel@sipsolutions.net>
Date:   Wed, 20 Jan 2021 18:38:15 +0100
From:   Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
To:     Peter Oberparleiter <oberpar@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:     linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Jessica Yu <jeyu@...nel.org>,
        linux-um@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] init/gcov: allow CONFIG_CONSTRUCTORS on UML to fix
 module gcov

On Wed, 2021-01-20 at 18:04 +0100, Peter Oberparleiter wrote:
> 
> > Tested with a kernel configured with CONFIG_GCOV_KERNEL, without
> > the patch nothing ever appears in /sys/kernel/debug/gcov/ (apart
> > from the reset file), and with it we get the files and they work.
> 
> Just to be sure: could you confirm that this test statement for UML also
> applies to v2, i.e. that it fixes the original problem you were seeing?

Yes, I tested this version too :)

johannes