linux-kernel - linux-next: manual merge of the usb tree with the usb.current tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 20 Jan 2021 13:06:03 +1100
From:   Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:     Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
Cc:     Al Cooper <alcooperx@...il.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Patrik Jakobsson <patrik.r.jakobsson@...il.com>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the usb tree with the usb.current tree

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the usb tree got a conflict in:

  drivers/usb/gadget/udc/bdc/Kconfig

between commit:

  ef02684c4e67 ("usb: bdc: Make bdc pci driver depend on BROKEN")

from the usb.current tree and commit:

  7766cafea0ec ("usb: bdc: Remove the BDC PCI driver")

from the usb tree.

I fixed it up (the latter removed the text updated by the former) and
can carry the fix as necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next
is concerned, but any non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your
upstream maintainer when your tree is submitted for merging.  You may
also want to consider cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting
tree to minimise any particularly complex conflicts.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped