[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAGETcx_bT46e1JFsSDQ+Rv8uFwHYima-00anH220qmK=cCs=Ww@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2021 11:47:56 -0800
From: Saravana Kannan <saravanak@...gle.com>
To: Michael Walle <michael@...le.cc>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
PCI <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Minghuan Lian <minghuan.Lian@....com>,
Mingkai Hu <mingkai.hu@....com>, Roy Zang <roy.zang@....com>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI: dwc: layerscape: convert to builtin_platform_driver()
On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 11:47 AM Saravana Kannan <saravanak@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 11:28 AM Michael Walle <michael@...le.cc> wrote:
> >
> > [RESEND, fat-fingered the buttons of my mail client and converted
> > all CCs to BCCs :(]
> >
> > Am 2021-01-20 20:02, schrieb Saravana Kannan:
> > > On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 6:24 AM Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 4:53 AM Michael Walle <michael@...le.cc>
> > >> wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> > fw_devlink will defer the probe until all suppliers are ready. We can't
> > >> > use builtin_platform_driver_probe() because it doesn't retry after probe
> > >> > deferral. Convert it to builtin_platform_driver().
> > >>
> > >> If builtin_platform_driver_probe() doesn't work with fw_devlink, then
> > >> shouldn't it be fixed or removed?
> > >
> > > I was actually thinking about this too. The problem with fixing
> > > builtin_platform_driver_probe() to behave like
> > > builtin_platform_driver() is that these probe functions could be
> > > marked with __init. But there are also only 20 instances of
> > > builtin_platform_driver_probe() in the kernel:
> > > $ git grep ^builtin_platform_driver_probe | wc -l
> > > 20
> > >
> > > So it might be easier to just fix them to not use
> > > builtin_platform_driver_probe().
> > >
> > > Michael,
> > >
> > > Any chance you'd be willing to help me by converting all these to
> > > builtin_platform_driver() and delete builtin_platform_driver_probe()?
> >
> > If it just moving the probe function to the _driver struct and
> > remove the __init annotations. I could look into that.
>
> Yup. That's pretty much it AFAICT.
>
> builtin_platform_driver_probe() also makes sure the driver doesn't ask
> for async probe, etc. But I doubt anyone is actually setting async
> flags and still using builtin_platform_driver_probe().
>
And thanks for agreeing to help!
-Saravana
Powered by blists - more mailing lists