linux-kernel - [PATCH 18/25] afs: Log remote unmarshalling errors

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <161118149739.1232039.208060911149801695.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Date:   Wed, 20 Jan 2021 22:24:57 +0000
From:   David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To:     Trond Myklebust <trondmy@...merspace.com>,
        Anna Schumaker <anna.schumaker@...app.com>,
        Steve French <sfrench@...ba.org>,
        Dominique Martinet <asmadeus@...ewreck.org>
Cc:     dhowells@...hat.com, Jeff Layton <jlayton@...hat.com>,
        David Wysochanski <dwysocha@...hat.com>,
        Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
        Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
        linux-cachefs@...hat.com, linux-afs@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-cifs@...r.kernel.org,
        ceph-devel@...r.kernel.org, v9fs-developer@...ts.sourceforge.net,
        linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 18/25] afs: Log remote unmarshalling errors

Log unmarshalling errors reported by the peer (ie. it can't parse what we
sent it).  Limit the maximum number of messages to 3.

Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
---

 fs/afs/rxrpc.c |   34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+)

diff --git a/fs/afs/rxrpc.c b/fs/afs/rxrpc.c
index 0ec38b758f29..ae68576f822f 100644
--- a/fs/afs/rxrpc.c
+++ b/fs/afs/rxrpc.c
@@ -500,6 +500,39 @@ void afs_make_call(struct afs_addr_cursor *ac, struct afs_call *call, gfp_t gfp)
 	_leave(" = %d", ret);
 }
 
+/*
+ * Log remote abort codes that indicate that we have a protocol disagreement
+ * with the server.
+ */
+static void afs_log_error(struct afs_call *call, s32 remote_abort)
+{
+	static int max = 0;
+	const char *msg;
+	int m;
+
+	switch (remote_abort) {
+	case RX_EOF:		 msg = "unexpected EOF";	break;
+	case RXGEN_CC_MARSHAL:	 msg = "client marshalling";	break;
+	case RXGEN_CC_UNMARSHAL: msg = "client unmarshalling";	break;
+	case RXGEN_SS_MARSHAL:	 msg = "server marshalling";	break;
+	case RXGEN_SS_UNMARSHAL: msg = "server unmarshalling";	break;
+	case RXGEN_DECODE:	 msg = "opcode decode";		break;
+	case RXGEN_SS_XDRFREE:	 msg = "server XDR cleanup";	break;
+	case RXGEN_CC_XDRFREE:	 msg = "client XDR cleanup";	break;
+	case -32:		 msg = "insufficient data";	break;
+	default:
+		return;
+	}
+
+	m = max;
+	if (m < 3) {
+		max = m + 1;
+		pr_notice("kAFS: Peer reported %s failure on %s [%pISp]\n",
+			  msg, call->type->name,
+			  &call->alist->addrs[call->addr_ix].transport);
+	}
+}
+
 /*
  * deliver messages to a call
  */
@@ -563,6 +596,7 @@ static void afs_deliver_to_call(struct afs_call *call)
 			goto out;
 		case -ECONNABORTED:
 			ASSERTCMP(state, ==, AFS_CALL_COMPLETE);
+			afs_log_error(call, call->abort_code);
 			goto done;
 		case -ENOTSUPP:
 			abort_code = RXGEN_OPCODE;