[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20210120061235.148637-1-ying.huang@intel.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2021 14:12:32 +0800
From: Huang Ying <ying.huang@...el.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Huang Ying <ying.huang@...el.com>,
"Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@...radead.org>,
Rafael Aquini <aquini@...hat.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>, linux-api@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH -V9 0/3] numa balancing: Migrate on fault among multiple bound nodes
To make it possible to optimize cross-socket memory accessing with
AutoNUMA even if the memory of the application is bound to multiple
NUMA nodes.
Patch [2/3] and [3/3] are NOT kernel patches. Instead, they are
patches for man-pages and numactl respectively. They are sent
together to make it easy to review the newly added kernel API.
Changes:
v9:
- Rebased on latest mmotm kernel v5.11-rc3-mmots-2021-01-12-02-00
v8:
- Rebased on latest upstream kernel v5.11-rc2
v7:
- Make set_mempolicy() return -1 with errno is set to EINVAL if mode
isn't MPOL_BIND per Mel's comments. Revise document accordingly
too.
v6:
- Rebased on latest upstream kernel v5.10-rc5
- Added some benchmark data and example in patch description of [1/3]
- Rename AutoNUMA to NUMA Balancing
- Add patches to man-pages [2/3] and numactl [3/3]
v5:
- Remove mbind() support, because it's not clear that it's necessary.
v4:
- Use new flags instead of reuse MPOL_MF_LAZY.
v3:
- Rebased on latest upstream (v5.10-rc3)
- Revised the change log.
v2:
- Rebased on latest upstream (v5.10-rc1)
Best Regards,
Huang, Ying
Powered by blists - more mailing lists