linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] powerpc/47x: Disable 256k page size

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 20 Jan 2021 07:31:35 +0100
From:   Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>
To:     Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
        Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
        Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc/47x: Disable 256k page size



Le 20/01/2021 à 06:45, Michael Ellerman a écrit :
> Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu> writes:
>> PPC47x_TLBE_SIZE isn't defined for 256k pages, so
>> this size of page shall not be selected for 47x.
>>
>> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
>> Fixes: e7f75ad01d59 ("powerpc/47x: Base ppc476 support")
>> Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>
>> ---
>>   arch/powerpc/Kconfig | 2 +-
>>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/Kconfig b/arch/powerpc/Kconfig
>> index 107bb4319e0e..a685e42d3993 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/Kconfig
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/Kconfig
>> @@ -772,7 +772,7 @@ config PPC_64K_PAGES
>>   
>>   config PPC_256K_PAGES
>>   	bool "256k page size"
>> -	depends on 44x && !STDBINUTILS
>> +	depends on 44x && !STDBINUTILS && !PPC_47x
> 
> Do we still need this STDBINUTILS thing?
> 
> It's pretty gross, and I notice we have zero defconfigs which disable
> it, meaning it's only randconfig builds that will ever test 256K pages.
> 
> Can we just drop it and say if you enable 256K pages you need to know
> what you're doing?

I guess we can, yes. I'll send a patch for that.

Christophe

>