[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAGETcx_pUxH9gUUigsC7pFgtC_Ppw7gzcvHdSqZO0YtUvb3fcg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2021 23:45:53 -0800
From: Saravana Kannan <saravanak@...gle.com>
To: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Saravana Kannan <saravanak@...gle.com>
Cc: linux-tegra <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
Jon Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
Android Kernel Team <kernel-team@...roid.com>,
"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS"
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] of: property: Add fw_devlink support for "gpio" and
"gpios" binding
On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 11:33 PM Saravana Kannan <saravanak@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> To provide backward compatibility for boards that use deprecated DT
> bindings, we need to add fw_devlink support for "gpio" and "gpios".
>
> Cc: linux-tegra <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>
> Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
> Cc: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>
> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
> Fixes: e590474768f1 ("driver core: Set fw_devlink=on by default")
> Tested-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>
> Signed-off-by: Saravana Kannan <saravanak@...gle.com>
> ---
> Greg/Rob,
>
> I think it's better for this to go into driver-core-next because this
> fixed fw_devlink=on change that's queued for 5.12-rcX.
>
> -Saravana
>
> drivers/of/property.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/of/property.c b/drivers/of/property.c
> index 5f9eed79a8aa..0b256ce9d7d5 100644
> --- a/drivers/of/property.c
> +++ b/drivers/of/property.c
> @@ -1271,6 +1271,24 @@ static struct device_node *parse_iommu_maps(struct device_node *np,
> return of_parse_phandle(np, prop_name, (index * 4) + 1);
> }
>
> +static struct device_node *parse_gpio_compat(struct device_node *np,
> + const char *prop_name, int index)
> +{
> + struct of_phandle_args sup_args;
> +
> + if (strcmp(prop_name, "gpio") && strcmp(prop_name, "gpios"))
> + return NULL;
> +
> + if (of_find_property(np, "gpio-hog", NULL))
> + return NULL;
> +
> + if (of_parse_phandle_with_args(np, prop_name, "#gpio-cells", index,
> + &sup_args))
> + return NULL;
> +
> + return sup_args.np;
> +}
> +
> static const struct supplier_bindings of_supplier_bindings[] = {
> { .parse_prop = parse_clocks, },
> { .parse_prop = parse_interconnects, },
> @@ -1296,6 +1314,7 @@ static const struct supplier_bindings of_supplier_bindings[] = {
> { .parse_prop = parse_pinctrl6, },
> { .parse_prop = parse_pinctrl7, },
> { .parse_prop = parse_pinctrl8, },
> + { .parse_prop = parse_gpio_compat, },
> { .parse_prop = parse_regulators, },
> { .parse_prop = parse_gpio, },
> { .parse_prop = parse_gpios, },
> --
> 2.30.0.284.gd98b1dd5eaa7-goog
>
Please ignore this patch. I'm going to make this part of a series I'll
be sending out.
-Saravana
Powered by blists - more mailing lists