lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 20 Jan 2021 09:20:39 +0100
From:   Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To:     Stafford Horne <shorne@...il.com>
Cc:     Karol Gugala <kgugala@...micro.com>,
        Mateusz Holenko <mholenko@...micro.com>,
        Gabriel Somlo <gsomlo@...il.com>,
        linux-riscv <linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Joel Stanley <joel@....id.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] drivers/soc/litex: Add restart handler

Hi Stafford,

On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 11:11 PM Stafford Horne <shorne@...il.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 06:34:44AM +0900, Stafford Horne wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 09:09:38AM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > > Let the LiteX SoC Controller register a restart handler, which resets
> > > the LiteX SoC by writing 1 to CSR_CTRL_RESET_ADDR.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
> >
> > Thanks, this looks good to me, queued to my linux-next branch.
> >
> > -Stafford
> >
> > > @@ -66,8 +71,19 @@ static int litex_check_csr_access(void __iomem *reg_addr)
> > >
> > >  struct litex_soc_ctrl_device {
> > >     void __iomem *base;
> > > +   struct notifier_block reset_nb;
> > >  };
> > >
> > > +static int litex_reset_handler(struct notifier_block *this, unsigned long mode,
> > > +                          void *cmd)
> > > +{
> > > +   struct litex_soc_ctrl_device *soc_ctrl_dev =
> > > +           container_of(this, struct litex_soc_ctrl_device, reset_nb);
> >
> > Nice.
> >
> > > +   litex_write32(soc_ctrl_dev->base + RESET_REG_OFF, RESET_REG_VALUE);
> > > +   return NOTIFY_DONE;
> > > +}
> > > +
>
> Actually, I tested this out on the latest (2-weeks ago) Litex and
> openrisc/for-next and it didn't seem to work correctly.
>
> I will look into it a bit closer, but if you see or can think of anything let
> me know.  Note There are a few failures below related to network services as my
> for-next kernel doesnt have a network driver (yet).

Hmmm, openrisc/for-next does have commit 131172a4a8ce3fcc ("openrisc:
restart: Call common handlers before hanging").

It's been a few years I used an OpenRISC setup.
Do you have a link to Linux on mor1kx/LiteX setup instructions?

>
> Using my buildroot rootfs: http://shorne.noip.me/downloads/or1k-glibc-rootfs.cpio.gz
>
>     # shutdown -r now
>
>     Broadcast message from root@...ldroot (console) (Thu Jan  1 00:00:48 1970):
>     The system is going down for reboot NOW!
>     INIT: Switching to runlevel: 6
>     # mounting home work nfs ...
>     mount: mounting 10.0.0.27:/home/shorne/work on /home/shorne/work failed: No such device
>     enabling login for shorne ...
>     setting coredumps ...
>     Stopping dropbear sshd: FAIL
>     Stopping ntpd: FAIL
>     Nothing to do, sntp is not a daemon.
>     Stopping network: ifdown: interface lo not configured
>     ifdown: interface eth0 not configured
>     OK
>     Saving random seed: [   52.020000] random: dd: uninitialized urandom read (512 bytes read)
>     OK
>     Stopping klogd: OK
>     Stopping syslogd: start-stop-daemon: warning: killing process 51: No such process
>     FAIL
>     umount: devtmpfs busy - remounted read-only
>     umount: can't unmount /: Invalid argument
>     [   53.710000] reboot: Restarting system
>     [   54.710000] Reboot failed -- System halted
>     [   76.040000] watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck for 22s! [reboot:131]
>     [   76.040000] CPU: 0 PID: 131 Comm: reboot Not tainted 5.11.0-rc1-00009-gff28dae0bc90 #418
>     [   76.040000] CPU #: 0
>     [   76.040000]    PC: c00050b8    SR: 0000827f    SP: c180fdb0
>     [   76.040000] GPR00: 00000000 GPR01: c180fdb0 GPR02: c180fdc0 GPR03: 0000827f
>     [   76.040000] GPR04: c0348944 GPR05: 00000000 GPR06: c180fc70 GPR07: 00000000
>     [   76.040000] GPR08: c180fdb0 GPR09: c00050b8 GPR10: c180e000 GPR11: 0000001e
>     [   76.040000] GPR12: 00000000 GPR13: 00000020 GPR14: 00000001 GPR15: 00000000
>     [   76.040000] GPR16: 00000000 GPR17: c02e48d4 GPR18: 00418958 GPR19: c02e48d4
>     [   76.040000] GPR20: 00000000 GPR21: 00000000 GPR22: c02e4018 GPR23: fffffffe
>     [   76.040000] GPR24: ffffffff GPR25: 00000000 GPR26: 00000000 GPR27: 00000000
>     [   76.040000] GPR28: 00000000 GPR29: ffffffff GPR30: 00000000 GPR31: ffffffff
>     [   76.040000]   RES: 0000001e oGPR11: ffffffff
>     [   76.040000] Process reboot (pid: 131, stackpage=c180a000)
>     [   76.040000]
>     [   76.040000] Stack:
>     [   76.040000] Call trace:
>     [   76.040000] [<(ptrval)>] machine_restart+0x44/0x5c
>     [   76.040000] [<(ptrval)>] kernel_restart+0x78/0xa4
>     [   76.040000] [<(ptrval)>] ? mutex_lock+0x24/0x50
>     [   76.040000] [<(ptrval)>] __do_sys_reboot+0x1a8/0x21c
>     [   76.040000] [<(ptrval)>] ? do_filp_open+0x40/0xa0
>     [   76.040000] [<(ptrval)>] ? slab_free_freelist_hook+0x6c/0x14c
>     [   76.040000] [<(ptrval)>] ? arch_local_irq_save+0x24/0x3c
>     [   76.040000] [<(ptrval)>] ? kmem_cache_free+0x130/0x194
>     [   76.040000] [<(ptrval)>] ? call_rcu+0x50/0x8c
>     [   76.040000] [<(ptrval)>] ? __fput+0x2d0/0x2f4
>     [   76.040000] [<(ptrval)>] ? do_sys_openat2+0xd8/0x134
>     [   76.040000] [<(ptrval)>] ? task_work_run+0xbc/0xf4
>     [   76.040000] [<(ptrval)>] ? do_work_pending+0x60/0x12c
>     [   76.040000] [<(ptrval)>] sys_reboot+0x14/0x24
>     [   76.040000] [<(ptrval)>] ? _syscall_return+0x0/0x4
>
>
> -Stafford



-- 
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

-- 
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds

Powered by blists - more mailing lists