[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8df4e1e1-1ddd-398e-c9a6-17a67d8a95bc@arm.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2021 14:07:18 +0530
From: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@....com>
To: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@...e.de>,
David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, hca@...ux.ibm.com,
catalin.marinas@....com, Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 0/3] mm/memory_hotplug: Pre-validate the address range
with platform
On 1/19/21 7:10 PM, Oscar Salvador wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 02:33:03PM +0100, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>> Minor thing, we should make up our mind if we want to call stuff
>> internally "memhp_" or "mhp". I prefer the latter, because it is shorter.
>
> I would rather use the latter as well. I used that in [1].
Okay, will change all that is 'memhp' as 'mhp' instead.
> MEMHP_MERGE_RESOURCE should be renamed if we agree on that.
>
> [1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-mm/cover/20201217130758.11565-1-osalvador@suse.de/
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists