linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] perf metricgroup: Fix system PMU metrics

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <c3d8d635-33ab-8d7e-6efc-6a589aebeb52@huawei.com>
Date:   Wed, 20 Jan 2021 09:15:54 +0000
From:   John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>
To:     Joakim Zhang <qiangqing.zhang@....com>,
        "peterz@...radead.org" <peterz@...radead.org>,
        "mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
        "acme@...nel.org" <acme@...nel.org>,
        "mark.rutland@....com" <mark.rutland@....com>,
        "alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com" 
        <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
        "jolsa@...hat.com" <jolsa@...hat.com>,
        "namhyung@...nel.org" <namhyung@...nel.org>,
        "irogers@...gle.com" <irogers@...gle.com>,
        "kjain@...ux.ibm.com" <kjain@...ux.ibm.com>
CC:     "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linuxarm@...neuler.org" <linuxarm@...neuler.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf metricgroup: Fix system PMU metrics

On 20/01/2021 05:15, Joakim Zhang wrote:
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>
>> Sent: 2021年1月20日 1:33
>> To: Joakim Zhang <qiangqing.zhang@....com>; peterz@...radead.org;
>> mingo@...hat.com; acme@...nel.org; mark.rutland@....com;
>> alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com; jolsa@...hat.com;
>> namhyung@...nel.org; irogers@...gle.com; kjain@...ux.ibm.com
>> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; linuxarm@...neuler.org
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf metricgroup: Fix system PMU metrics
>>
>> On 19/01/2021 15:47, John Garry wrote:
>>> On 19/01/2021 10:56, Joakim Zhang wrote:
>>>> It seems have other issue compared to 5.10 kernel after switching to
>>>> this framework, below metric can't work.
>>>> "MetricExpr": "(( imx8_ddr0@...d\\-cycles@ +
>>>> imx8_ddr0@...te\\-cycles@
>>>> ) * 4 * 4 / duration_time) / (750 * 1000000 * 4 * 4)"
>>>> After change to:
>>>> "MetricExpr": "(( imx8mm_ddr.read_cycles + imx8mm_ddr.write_cycles )
>>>> *
>>>> 4 * 4 / duration_time) / (750 * 1000000 * 4 * 4)",
>>>
>>> It seems that any metric which includes "duration_time" is broken,
>>> even on x86:
>>>
>>> john@...alhost:~/acme/tools/perf> sudo ./perf stat -v -M
>>> L1D_Cache_Fill_BW sleep 1 Using CPUID GenuineIntel-6-3D-4 metric expr
>>> 64 * l1d.replacement / 1000000000 / duration_time for
>>> L1D_Cache_Fill_BW found event duration_time found event
>>> l1d.replacement adding {l1d.replacement}:W,duration_time
>>> l1d.replacement -> cpu/umask=0x1,(null)=0x1e8483,event=0x51/
>>> Segmentation fault
>>>
>>>
>>> Seems to be from my commit c2337d67199 ("perf metricgroup: Fix metrics
>>> using aliases covering multiple PMUs")
>>>
>>> I'll look to fix it now.
>>>
>>
>> Please try this:
>>
>>   From 2380f1ef0250e6818b3dbc7bff4a868810875e2a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00
>> 2001
>> From: John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>
>> Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2021 17:29:54 +0000
>> Subject: [PATCH] perf metricgroup: Fix metric support for duration_time
>>
>> For a metric using duration_time, the strcmp() check when finding identical
>> events in metric_events[] is broken, as it does not consider that the
>> event pmu_name is NULL - it would be for duration_time.
>>
>> As such, add a NULL check here for event pmu_name.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>
>>
>> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/metricgroup.c b/tools/perf/util/metricgroup.c
>> index ee94d3e8dd65..277adff8017f 100644
>> --- a/tools/perf/util/metricgroup.c
>> +++ b/tools/perf/util/metricgroup.c
>> @@ -280,6 +280,8 @@ static struct evsel *find_evsel_group(struct evlist
>> *perf_evlist,
>>    			 */
>>    			if (!has_constraint &&
>>    			    ev->leader != metric_events[i]->leader &&
>> +			    ev->leader->pmu_name &&
>> +			    metric_events[i]->leader->pmu_name &&
>>    			    !strcmp(ev->leader->pmu_name,
>>    				    metric_events[i]->leader->pmu_name))
>>    				break;
>> --
>> 2.26.2
>>
>>
> 
> For this patch: Tested-by: Joakim Zhang <qiangqing.zhang@....com>
> 
> Hi John, Jolsa,
> 
> Is there any way to avoid breaking exist metric expressions? If not, it will always happened after metricgroup changes.
> 

They are not normally broken like that. Normally we test beforehand, but 
these cases were missed here by me. However if you were testing them 
previously, then it would be expected that you had tested them again for 
the final patchset which was merged.

Anyway, we can look to add metric tests for these.

@Arnaldo, I will send separate formal patch for this today.

Thanks,
John