linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/3] net: usb: cdc_ncm: don't spew notifications

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20210119170546.189e12d1@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com>
Date:   Tue, 19 Jan 2021 17:05:46 -0800
From:   Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To:     Grant Grundler <grundler@...omium.org>
Cc:     Oliver Neukum <oliver@...kum.org>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] net: usb: cdc_ncm: don't spew notifications

On Wed, 20 Jan 2021 00:59:17 +0000 Grant Grundler wrote:
> > > Thanks for the patch, this looks like an improvement over:
> > >
> > > 59b4a8fa27f5 ("CDC-NCM: remove "connected" log message")
> > >
> > > right? Should we bring the "network connection: connected" message back?  
> >
> > Yes, we can revert Roland's patch. I didn't see that one.
> >  
> > > Do you want all of these patches to be applied to 5.11 and backported?  
> >
> > Yes to 5.11. Only the 3rd one really needs to be applied to stable kernels.  
> 
> Sorry - I was thinking 5.11 was -next (and that's incorrect).
> 
> As you suggested below, only the 3rd one really needs to be applied to
> 5.11 and other stable kernels.

Cool, would you mind reposting just the 3rd patch separately, and
tagged as [PATCH net] so that CI can give it a shaking? We'll go 
from there with the rest.

> >  
> > > Feels to me like the last one is a fix and the rest can go into -next,
> > > WDYT?  
> >
> > Exactly.