linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH] x86/gpu: add JSL stolen memory support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <SN6PR11MB34215740DC23DEB73D85B016DFA20@SN6PR11MB3421.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Date:   Wed, 20 Jan 2021 10:04:26 +0000
From:   "Surendrakumar Upadhyay, TejaskumarX" 
        <tejaskumarx.surendrakumar.upadhyay@...el.com>
To:     Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>,
        Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@...ux.intel.com>
CC:     Jesse Barnes <jsbarnes@...gle.com>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
        "Linux PCI" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        "De Marchi, Lucas" <lucas.demarchi@...el.com>,
        "Roper, Matthew D" <matthew.d.roper@...el.com>,
        "Pandey, Hariom" <hariom.pandey@...el.com>,
        Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
        "Vivi, Rodrigo" <rodrigo.vivi@...el.com>,
        David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] x86/gpu: add JSL stolen memory support

Hello,

Have we decided anything on this patch?

Thanks,
Tejas

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Surendrakumar Upadhyay, TejaskumarX
> Sent: 03 December 2020 21:40
> To: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>; Joonas Lahtinen
> <joonas.lahtinen@...ux.intel.com>
> Cc: Jesse Barnes <jsbarnes@...gle.com>; Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>;
> Linux PCI <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>; Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-
> kernel@...r.kernel.org>; X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>; Borislav Petkov
> <bp@...en8.de>; De Marchi, Lucas <lucas.demarchi@...el.com>; Roper,
> Matthew D <matthew.d.roper@...el.com>; Pandey, Hariom
> <hariom.pandey@...el.com>; Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>; Vivi,
> Rodrigo <rodrigo.vivi@...el.com>; David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>
> Subject: RE: [PATCH] x86/gpu: add JSL stolen memory support
> 
> Okay then I will wait for someone to respond with "Reviewed-by". So this can
> be merged.
> 
> Thanks,
> Tejas
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
> > Sent: 03 December 2020 20:55
> > To: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@...ux.intel.com>
> > Cc: Surendrakumar Upadhyay, TejaskumarX
> > <tejaskumarx.surendrakumar.upadhyay@...el.com>; Jesse Barnes
> > <jsbarnes@...gle.com>; Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>; Linux PCI
> > <linux- pci@...r.kernel.org>; Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-
> > kernel@...r.kernel.org>; X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>; Borislav Petkov
> > <bp@...en8.de>; De Marchi, Lucas <lucas.demarchi@...el.com>; Roper,
> > Matthew D <matthew.d.roper@...el.com>; Pandey, Hariom
> > <hariom.pandey@...el.com>; Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>;
> > Vivi, Rodrigo <rodrigo.vivi@...el.com>; David Airlie
> > <airlied@...ux.ie>
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/gpu: add JSL stolen memory support
> >
> > On Thu, Dec 03, 2020 at 10:46:29AM +0200, Joonas Lahtinen wrote:
> > > Quoting Bjorn Helgaas (2020-12-02 22:22:53)
> > > > On Wed, Dec 02, 2020 at 05:21:58AM +0000, Surendrakumar Upadhyay,
> > TejaskumarX wrote:
> > > > > Yes it fails all the tests which are allocating from this stolen
> > > > > memory bunch. For example IGT tests like "
> > > > > igt@..._frontbuffer_tracking@-[fbc|fbcpsr].* |
> > > > > igt@..._fbcon_fbt@....* " are failing as they totally depend to
> > > > > work on stolen memory.
> > >
> > > That's just because we have de-duped the stolen memory detection code.
> > > If it's not detected at the early quirks, it's not detected by the
> > > driver at all.
> > >
> > > So if the patch is not merged to early quirks, we'd have to refactor
> > > the code to add alternative detection path to i915. Before that is
> > > done, the failures are expected.
> > >
> > > > I'm sure that means something to graphics developers, but I have
> > > > no idea!  Do you have URLs for the test case source, outputs,
> > > > dmesg log, lspci info, bug reports, etc?
> > >
> > > The thing is, the bug reports for stuff like this would only start
> > > to flow after Jasperlake systems are shipping widely and the less
> > > common OEMs start integrating it to into strangely behaving BIOSes.
> > > Or that is the assumption.
> > >
> > > If it's fine to merge this through i915 for now with an Acked-by,
> > > like the previous patches, that'd be great. We can start a
> > > discussion on if the new platforms are affected anymore. But I'd
> > > rather not drop it before we have that understanding, as the
> > > previous problems have included boot time memory corruption.
> > >
> > > Would that work?
> >
> > Like I said, I'm not objecting if somebody else wants to apply this.
> >
> > I'm just pointing out that there's a little bit of voodoo here because
> > it's not clear what makes a BIOS strangely behaving or what causes
> > boot-time memory corruption, and that means we don't really have any
> > hope of resolving this stream of quirk updates.
> >
> > Bjorn