lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2021 17:01:02 -0700 From: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net> To: Milan Lakhani <milan.lakhani@...ethink.co.uk>, lukas.bulwahn@...il.com, sudip.mukherjee@...ethink.co.uk, linux-safety@...ts.elisa.tech, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, harryxiyou@...il.com, alex.shi@...ux.alibaba.com Cc: Milan Lakhani <milan.lakhani@...ethink.co.uk>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH] docs: Change reference that was to removed file Milan Lakhani <milan.lakhani@...ethink.co.uk> writes: [CC += Rob] > There were two references to > Documentation/devicetree/booting-without-of.rst for dtb format > information. This file has been removed, so I have changed the links to > Documentation/devicetree/usage-model.rst for this information, which > itself points to https://elinux.org/Device_Tree_Usage for an overview of > the device tree data format. > > Signed-off-by: Milan Lakhani <milan.lakhani@...ethink.co.uk> > --- > Documentation/arm/booting.rst | 2 +- > Documentation/translations/zh_CN/arm/Booting | 2 +- > 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/arm/booting.rst b/Documentation/arm/booting.rst > index a226345..5392d01 100644 > --- a/Documentation/arm/booting.rst > +++ b/Documentation/arm/booting.rst > @@ -128,7 +128,7 @@ it. The recommended placement is in the first 16KiB of RAM. > > The boot loader must load a device tree image (dtb) into system ram > at a 64bit aligned address and initialize it with the boot data. The > -dtb format is documented in Documentation/devicetree/booting-without-of.rst. > +dtb format is documented in Documentation/devicetree/usage-model.rst. Except that ... usage-model.rst doesn't actually document the DTB format. Perhaps we should instead substitute a link that does what's promised here? Thanks, jon
Powered by blists - more mailing lists