[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210120112643.ozlsru67yuur323i@box>
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2021 14:26:43 +0300
From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>
To: Arvind Sankar <nivedita@...m.mit.edu>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@...il.com>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Darren Hart <dvhart@...radead.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy@...radead.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
linux-efi <linux-efi@...r.kernel.org>,
platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
clang-built-linux <clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: efi: avoid BUILD_BUG_ON() for non-constant p4d_index
On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 04:42:20PM -0500, Arvind Sankar wrote:
> AFAICT, MODULES_END is only relevant as being something that happens to
> be in the top 512GiB, and -1ul would be clearer.
I think you are right. But -1UL is not very self-descriptive. :/
--
Kirill A. Shutemov
Powered by blists - more mailing lists