[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YAgr8RQg6Cn66bvf@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2021 14:11:13 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: vincent.donnefort@....com
Cc: tglx@...utronix.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
valentin.schneider@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] cpu/hotplug: Add cpuhp_invoke_callback_range()
On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 05:10:46PM +0000, vincent.donnefort@....com wrote:
> @@ -157,26 +162,24 @@ static int cpuhp_invoke_callback(unsigned int cpu, enum cpuhp_state state,
>
> if (st->fail == state) {
> st->fail = CPUHP_INVALID;
> -
> - if (!(bringup ? step->startup.single : step->teardown.single))
> - return 0;
> -
> return -EAGAIN;
> }
>
> + if (cpuhp_step_empty(bringup, step)) {
> + WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
> + return 0;
> + }
This changes the behaviour of fail.. might be best to refactor without
changing behaviour.
Lemme continue reading.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists