linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6 08/14] mm/gup: do not migrate zero page

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 20 Jan 2021 09:26:41 -0500
From:   Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@...een.com>
To:     Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>
Cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
        Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
        David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
        Oscar Salvador <osalvador@...e.de>,
        Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>,
        Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@...ux.microsoft.com>,
        Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>, mike.kravetz@...cle.com,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
        Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
        David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
        John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>,
        Linux Doc Mailing List <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
        Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>,
        linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 08/14] mm/gup: do not migrate zero page

On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 8:14 AM Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 08:43:27PM -0500, Pavel Tatashin wrote:
> > On some platforms ZERO_PAGE(0) might end-up in a movable zone. Do not
> > migrate zero page in gup during longterm pinning as migration of zero page
> > is not allowed.
> >
> > For example, in x86 QEMU with 16G of memory and kernelcore=5G parameter, I
> > see the following:
> >
> > Boot#1: zero_pfn  0x48a8d zero_pfn zone: ZONE_DMA32
> > Boot#2: zero_pfn 0x20168d zero_pfn zone: ZONE_MOVABLE
> >
> > On x86, empty_zero_page is declared in .bss and depending on the loader
> > may end up in different physical locations during boots.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@...een.com>
> >  include/linux/mmzone.h | 4 ++++
> >  mm/gup.c               | 2 ++
> >  2 files changed, 6 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/linux/mmzone.h b/include/linux/mmzone.h
> > index fc99e9241846..f67427a8f22b 100644
> > +++ b/include/linux/mmzone.h
> > @@ -427,6 +427,10 @@ enum zone_type {
> >        *    techniques might use alloc_contig_range() to hide previously
> >        *    exposed pages from the buddy again (e.g., to implement some sort
> >        *    of memory unplug in virtio-mem).
> > +      * 6. ZERO_PAGE(0), kernelcore/movablecore setups might create
> > +      *    situations where ZERO_PAGE(0) which is allocated differently
> > +      *    on different platforms may end up in a movable zone. ZERO_PAGE(0)
> > +      *    cannot be migrated.
> >        *
> >        * In general, no unmovable allocations that degrade memory offlining
> >        * should end up in ZONE_MOVABLE. Allocators (like alloc_contig_range())
> > diff --git a/mm/gup.c b/mm/gup.c
> > index 857b273e32ac..fdd5cda30a07 100644
> > +++ b/mm/gup.c
> > @@ -1580,6 +1580,8 @@ static long check_and_migrate_cma_pages(struct mm_struct *mm,
> >                * of the CMA zone if possible.
> >                */
> >               if (is_migrate_cma_page(head)) {
> > +                     if (is_zero_pfn(page_to_pfn(head)))
> > +                             continue;
>
> I think you should put this logic in is_pinnable_page()

I thought about this, and it would code a little cleaner. But, the
reason I did not is because zero_page is perfectly pinnable, it is not
pinnable only when it is in a movable zone (and it should not be in a
movable zones for other reasons as well), but that is another bug that
needs to be resolved, and once that bug is resolved this condition can
be removed from gup migration.

Pasha

>
> Jason