linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 8/9] KVM: arm64: vgic-v3: Expose GICR

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 20 Jan 2021 16:13:31 +0000
From:   Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@....com>
To:     Auger Eric <eric.auger@...hat.com>, eric.auger.pro@...il.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
        kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu, maz@...nel.org, drjones@...hat.com
Cc:     james.morse@....com, julien.thierry.kdev@...il.com,
        suzuki.poulose@....com, shuah@...nel.org, pbonzini@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/9] KVM: arm64: vgic-v3: Expose GICR_TYPER.Last for
 userspace

Hi Eric,

On 1/14/21 10:16 AM, Auger Eric wrote:
> Hi Alexandru,
>
> On 1/12/21 6:02 PM, Alexandru Elisei wrote:
>> Hi Eric,
>>
>> On 12/12/20 6:50 PM, Eric Auger wrote:
>>> Commit 23bde34771f1 ("KVM: arm64: vgic-v3: Drop the
>>> reporting of GICR_TYPER.Last for userspace") temporarily fixed
>>> a bug identified when attempting to access the GICR_TYPER
>>> register before the redistributor region setting but dropped
>>> the support of the LAST bit. This patch restores its
>>> support (if the redistributor region was set) while keeping the
>>> code safe.
>> I suppose the reason for emulating GICR_TYPER.Last is for architecture compliance,
>> right? I think that should be in the commit message.
> OK added this in the commit msg.
>>> Signed-off-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@...hat.com>
>>> ---
>>>  arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-mmio-v3.c | 7 ++++++-
>>>  include/kvm/arm_vgic.h             | 1 +
>>>  2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-mmio-v3.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-mmio-v3.c
>>> index 581f0f490000..2f9ef6058f6e 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-mmio-v3.c
>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-mmio-v3.c
>>> @@ -277,6 +277,8 @@ static unsigned long vgic_uaccess_read_v3r_typer(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>>>  						 gpa_t addr, unsigned int len)
>>>  {
>>>  	unsigned long mpidr = kvm_vcpu_get_mpidr_aff(vcpu);
>>> +	struct vgic_cpu *vgic_cpu = &vcpu->arch.vgic_cpu;
>>> +	struct vgic_redist_region *rdreg = vgic_cpu->rdreg;
>>>  	int target_vcpu_id = vcpu->vcpu_id;
>>>  	u64 value;
>>>  
>>> @@ -286,7 +288,9 @@ static unsigned long vgic_uaccess_read_v3r_typer(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>>>  	if (vgic_has_its(vcpu->kvm))
>>>  		value |= GICR_TYPER_PLPIS;
>>>  
>>> -	/* reporting of the Last bit is not supported for userspace */
>>> +	if (rdreg && (vgic_cpu->rdreg_index == (rdreg->free_index - 1)))
>>> +		value |= GICR_TYPER_LAST;
>>> +
>>>  	return extract_bytes(value, addr & 7, len);
>>>  }
>>>  
>>> @@ -714,6 +718,7 @@ int vgic_register_redist_iodev(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>>>  		return -EINVAL;
>>>  
>>>  	vgic_cpu->rdreg = rdreg;
>>> +	vgic_cpu->rdreg_index = rdreg->free_index;
>> What happens if the next redistributor region we register has the base address
>> adjacent to this one?
>>
>> I'm really not familiar with the code, but is it not possible to create two
>> Redistributor regions (via
>> KVM_DEV_ARM_VGIC_GRP_ADDR(KVM_VGIC_V3_ADDR_TYPE_REDIST)) where the second
>> Redistributor region start address is immediately after the last Redistributor in
>> the preceding region?
> KVM_VGIC_V3_ADDR_TYPE_REDIST only allows to create a single rdist
> region. Only KVM_VGIC_V3_ADDR_TYPE_REDIST_REGION allows to register
> several of them.
>
> with KVM_VGIC_V3_ADDR_TYPE_REDIST_REGION, it is possible to register
> adjacent rdist regions. vgic_v3_rdist_free_slot() previously returned
> the 1st rdist region where enough space remains for inserting the new
> reg. We put the rdist at the free index there.
>
> But maybe I misunderstood your question?

Yes, I think you did a good job at answering my poorly worded question.

This is the case I am concerned about:

1. Userspace sets first redistributor base address to 0x0 via
KVM_VGIC_V3_ADDR_TYPE_REDIST_REGION(count = 1, base = 0x0, flags = 0, index = 0).

2. Userspace sets first redistributor base address to 0x0 + 128K, immediately
following the previous Redistributor.

In that case the two Redistributors will be represented by two separate struct
vgic_redist_region, but they are adjacent to one another and represent one
contiguous memory region.

>From what I understand from your patch, GICR_TYPER.Last will be set for both
Redistributors, when it should be set only for the second Redistributor. Does any
of that make sense?

Thanks,
Alex
>
> Thanks
>
> Eric
>> Thanks,
>> Alex
>>>  
>>>  	rd_base = rdreg->base + rdreg->free_index * KVM_VGIC_V3_REDIST_SIZE;
>>>  
>>> diff --git a/include/kvm/arm_vgic.h b/include/kvm/arm_vgic.h
>>> index a8d8fdcd3723..596c069263a7 100644
>>> --- a/include/kvm/arm_vgic.h
>>> +++ b/include/kvm/arm_vgic.h
>>> @@ -322,6 +322,7 @@ struct vgic_cpu {
>>>  	 */
>>>  	struct vgic_io_device	rd_iodev;
>>>  	struct vgic_redist_region *rdreg;
>>> +	u32 rdreg_index;
>>>  
>>>  	/* Contains the attributes and gpa of the LPI pending tables. */
>>>  	u64 pendbaser;