lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210121155139.GG21811@gaia>
Date:   Thu, 21 Jan 2021 15:51:39 +0000
From:   Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
To:     Sudarshan Rajagopalan <sudaraja@...eaurora.org>
Cc:     linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
        Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@....com>,
        David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
        Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Logan Gunthorpe <logang@...tatee.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Steven Price <steven.price@....com>,
        Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] arm64/sparsemem: reduce SECTION_SIZE_BITS

On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 09:29:13PM -0800, Sudarshan Rajagopalan wrote:
> memory_block_size_bytes() determines the memory hotplug granularity i.e the
> amount of memory which can be hot added or hot removed from the kernel. The
> generic value here being MIN_MEMORY_BLOCK_SIZE (1UL << SECTION_SIZE_BITS)
> for memory_block_size_bytes() on platforms like arm64 that does not override.
> 
> Current SECTION_SIZE_BITS is 30 i.e 1GB which is large and a reduction here
> increases memory hotplug granularity, thus improving its agility. A reduced
> section size also reduces memory wastage in vmemmmap mapping for sections
> with large memory holes. So we try to set the least section size as possible.
> 
> A section size bits selection must follow:
> (MAX_ORDER - 1 + PAGE_SHIFT) <= SECTION_SIZE_BITS
> 
> CONFIG_FORCE_MAX_ZONEORDER is always defined on arm64 and so just following it
> would help achieve the smallest section size.
> 
> SECTION_SIZE_BITS = (CONFIG_FORCE_MAX_ZONEORDER - 1 + PAGE_SHIFT)
> 
> SECTION_SIZE_BITS = 22 (11 - 1 + 12) i.e 4MB   for 4K pages
> SECTION_SIZE_BITS = 24 (11 - 1 + 14) i.e 16MB  for 16K pages without THP
> SECTION_SIZE_BITS = 25 (12 - 1 + 14) i.e 32MB  for 16K pages with THP
> SECTION_SIZE_BITS = 26 (11 - 1 + 16) i.e 64MB  for 64K pages without THP
> SECTION_SIZE_BITS = 29 (14 - 1 + 16) i.e 512MB for 64K pages with THP
> 
> But there are other problems in reducing SECTION_SIZE_BIT. Reducing it by too
> much would over populate /sys/devices/system/memory/ and also consume too many
> page->flags bits in the !vmemmap case. Also section size needs to be multiple
> of 128MB to have PMD based vmemmap mapping with CONFIG_ARM64_4K_PAGES.
> 
> Given these constraints, lets just reduce the section size to 128MB for 4K
> and 16K base page size configs, and to 512MB for 64K base page size config.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sudarshan Rajagopalan <sudaraja@...eaurora.org>
> Suggested-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@....com>
> Suggested-by: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
> Cc: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
> Cc: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@....com>
> Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
> Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.ibm.com>
> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
> Cc: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@...tatee.com>
> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
> Cc: Steven Price <steven.price@....com>
> Cc: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>

Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ