lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 21 Jan 2021 14:09:51 -0500
From:   Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To:     Denis Efremov <efremov@...ux.com>
Cc:     Gaurav Kohli <gkohli@...eaurora.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] trace: Fix race in trace_open and buffer resize call

On Thu, 21 Jan 2021 17:30:40 +0300
Denis Efremov <efremov@...ux.com> wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> This patch (CVE-2020-27825) was tagged with
> Fixes: b23d7a5f4a07a ("ring-buffer: speed up buffer resets by avoiding synchronize_rcu for each CPU")
> 
> I'm not an expert here but it seems like b23d7a5f4a07a only refactored
> ring_buffer_reset_cpu() by introducing reset_disabled_cpu_buffer() without
> significant changes. Hence, mutex_lock(&buffer->mutex)/mutex_unlock(&buffer->mutex)
> can be backported further than b23d7a5f4a07a~ and to all LTS kernels. Is
> b23d7a5f4a07a the actual cause of the bug?
> 

Ug, that looks to be a mistake. Looking back at the thread about this:

  https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/20200915141304.41fa7c30@gandalf.local.home/

That should have been:

Depends-on: b23d7a5f4a07 ("ring-buffer: speed up buffer resets by avoiding synchronize_rcu for each CPU")

-- Steve

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ