[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+icZUW63tP7kzWCKofJH0E0xA7yLCYpSOYz_aw1D4mkhNhW=w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2021 03:21:43 +0100
From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@...il.com>
To: Bill Wendling <morbo@...gle.com>
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org,
Clang-Built-Linux ML <clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@...il.com>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pgo: add clang's Profile Guided Optimization infrastructure
Hi,
When I looked through the code I wondered why we do not add a
"CONFIG_PGO_CLANG_PROFDATA" which can be helpful when doing the PGO
rebuild with a vmlinux.profdata.
This introduces a "PGO_PROFDATA" to turn on/off to pass
"-fprofile-use=vmlinux.profdata" (see CFLAGS_PGO_CLANG_PROFDATA in
top-level Makefile).
If we turn off via "PGO_PROFILE := n" in several Makefiles - we should
do the same and add "PGO_PROFDATA := n" to the same Makefiles?
Please see the attached diff.
Regards,
- Sedat -
View attachment "CONFIG_PGO_CLANG_PROFDATA.diff" of type "text/x-patch" (4769 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists