[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210121184938.GD260413@xz-x1>
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2021 13:49:38 -0500
From: Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>
To: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@...gle.com>
Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@....com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Chinwen Chang <chinwen.chang@...iatek.com>,
Huang Ying <ying.huang@...el.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>,
Jerome Glisse <jglisse@...hat.com>,
Lokesh Gidra <lokeshgidra@...gle.com>,
"Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@...radead.org>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Michal Koutný <mkoutny@...e.com>,
Michel Lespinasse <walken@...gle.com>,
Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>, Shaohua Li <shli@...com>,
Shawn Anastasio <shawn@...stas.io>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Steven Price <steven.price@....com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Adam Ruprecht <ruprecht@...gle.com>,
Cannon Matthews <cannonmatthews@...gle.com>,
"Dr . David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@...hat.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Oliver Upton <oupton@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/9] userfaultfd: add minor fault registration mode
Hi, Axel,
On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 11:04:47AM -0800, Axel Rasmussen wrote:
> diff --git a/include/linux/userfaultfd_k.h b/include/linux/userfaultfd_k.h
> index c63ccdae3eab..7aa1461e1a8b 100644
> --- a/include/linux/userfaultfd_k.h
> +++ b/include/linux/userfaultfd_k.h
> @@ -71,6 +71,11 @@ static inline bool userfaultfd_wp(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
> return vma->vm_flags & VM_UFFD_WP;
> }
>
> +static inline bool userfaultfd_minor(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
> +{
> + return vma->vm_flags & VM_UFFD_MINOR;
> +}
> +
> static inline bool userfaultfd_pte_wp(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> pte_t pte)
> {
> @@ -85,7 +90,7 @@ static inline bool userfaultfd_huge_pmd_wp(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>
> static inline bool userfaultfd_armed(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
> {
> - return vma->vm_flags & (VM_UFFD_MISSING | VM_UFFD_WP);
> + return vma->vm_flags & (VM_UFFD_MISSING | VM_UFFD_WP | VM_UFFD_MINOR);
> }
Maybe move the __VM_UFFD_FLAGS into this header so use it too here?
[...]
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/userfaultfd.h b/include/uapi/linux/userfaultfd.h
> index 5f2d88212f7c..1cc2cd8a5279 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/userfaultfd.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/userfaultfd.h
> @@ -19,15 +19,19 @@
> * means the userland is reading).
> */
> #define UFFD_API ((__u64)0xAA)
> +#define UFFD_API_REGISTER_MODES (UFFDIO_REGISTER_MODE_MISSING | \
> + UFFDIO_REGISTER_MODE_WP | \
> + UFFDIO_REGISTER_MODE_MINOR)
> #define UFFD_API_FEATURES (UFFD_FEATURE_PAGEFAULT_FLAG_WP | \
> UFFD_FEATURE_EVENT_FORK | \
> UFFD_FEATURE_EVENT_REMAP | \
> - UFFD_FEATURE_EVENT_REMOVE | \
> + UFFD_FEATURE_EVENT_REMOVE | \
> UFFD_FEATURE_EVENT_UNMAP | \
> UFFD_FEATURE_MISSING_HUGETLBFS | \
> UFFD_FEATURE_MISSING_SHMEM | \
> UFFD_FEATURE_SIGBUS | \
> - UFFD_FEATURE_THREAD_ID)
> + UFFD_FEATURE_THREAD_ID | \
> + UFFD_FEATURE_MINOR_FAULT_HUGETLBFS)
I'd remove the "_FAULT" to align with the missing features...
> diff --git a/mm/hugetlb.c b/mm/hugetlb.c
> index 61d6346ed009..2b3741d6130c 100644
> --- a/mm/hugetlb.c
> +++ b/mm/hugetlb.c
> @@ -4377,6 +4377,37 @@ static vm_fault_t hugetlb_no_page(struct mm_struct *mm,
> }
> }
>
> + /* Check for page in userfault range. */
> + if (!new_page && userfaultfd_minor(vma)) {
> + u32 hash;
> + struct vm_fault vmf = {
> + .vma = vma,
> + .address = haddr,
> + .flags = flags,
> + /*
> + * Hard to debug if it ends up being used by a callee
> + * that assumes something about the other uninitialized
> + * fields... same as in memory.c
> + */
> + };
> +
> + unlock_page(page);
> +
> + /*
> + * hugetlb_fault_mutex and i_mmap_rwsem must be dropped before
> + * handling userfault. Reacquire after handling fault to make
> + * calling code simpler.
> + */
> +
> + hash = hugetlb_fault_mutex_hash(mapping, idx);
> + mutex_unlock(&hugetlb_fault_mutex_table[hash]);
> + i_mmap_unlock_read(mapping);
> + ret = handle_userfault(&vmf, VM_UFFD_MINOR);
> + i_mmap_lock_read(mapping);
> + mutex_lock(&hugetlb_fault_mutex_table[hash]);
> + goto out;
I figured it easier if the whole chunk be put into the else block right after
find_lock_page(); will that work the same?
It's just not obviously clear on when we'll go into this block otherwise,
basically the dependency of new_page variable and when it's unset.
Thanks,
--
Peter Xu
Powered by blists - more mailing lists