lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2021 12:48:07 -0800 From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com> To: Jim Quinlan <jim2101024@...il.com>, Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>, Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com, james.quinlan@...adcom.com Cc: "moderated list:BROADCOM BCM2711/BCM2835 ARM ARCHITECTURE" <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, "open list:LIBATA SUBSYSTEM (Serial and Parallel ATA drivers)" <linux-ide@...r.kernel.org>, open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "open list:PCI NATIVE HOST BRIDGE AND ENDPOINT DRIVERS" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>, "moderated list:BROADCOM BCM2711/BCM2835 ARM ARCHITECTURE" <linux-rpi-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org> Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v3 0/2] ata: ahci_brcm: Fix use of BCM7216 reset controller On 1/14/2021 12:46 PM, Florian Fainelli wrote: > On 1/5/21 1:22 PM, Florian Fainelli wrote: >> On 12/23/20 4:05 PM, Florian Fainelli wrote: >>> >>> >>> On 12/16/2020 1:41 PM, Jim Quinlan wrote: >>>> v3 -- discard commit from v2; instead rely on the new function >>>> reset_control_rearm provided in a recent commit [1] applied >>>> to reset/next. >>>> -- New commit to correct pcie-brcmstb.c usage of a reset controller >>>> to use reset/rearm verses deassert/assert. >>>> >>>> v2 -- refactor rescal-reset driver to implement assert/deassert rather than >>>> reset because the reset call only fires once per lifetime and we need >>>> to reset after every resume from S2 or S3. >>>> -- Split the use of "ahci" and "rescal" controllers in separate fields >>>> to keep things simple. >>>> >>>> v1 -- original >>>> >>>> >>>> [1] Applied commit "reset: make shared pulsed reset controls re-triggerable" >>>> found at git://git.pengutronix.de/git/pza/linux.git >>>> branch reset/shared-retrigger >>> >>> The changes in that branch above have now landed in Linus' tree with: >>> >>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=557acb3d2cd9c82de19f944f6cc967a347735385 >>> >>> It would be good if we could get both patches applied via the same tree >>> or within the same cycle to avoid having either PCIe or SATA broken on >>> these platforms. >> >> Ping? Can someone apply those patches if you are happy with them? Thank you. > > Ping? Can we review and ideally also apply these patches? Thanks Is there something going on preventing these patches from being reviewed and/or applied? -- Florian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists