linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/9] tools/nolibc: fix build issues on aarch64 after unistd cleanup

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 21 Jan 2021 13:36:49 -0800
From:   "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
To:     Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>
Cc:     Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>, valentin.schneider@....com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/9] tools/nolibc: fix build issues on aarch64 after
 unistd cleanup

On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 09:17:14PM +0100, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 11:54:32AM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > > > It would be great if this could be applied soon so that it's possible to
> > > > use the rcutorture scripts without applying local hacks.
> > > 
> > > Makes sense. I was wondering, should we mark them for stable ? I don't
> > > know if anyone relies on these tests to validate stable kernels in
> > > fact.
> > 
> > I added Fixes tags that should make this happen, and they are now visible
> > at -rcu branch "dev".  Could you please check them for me?
> 
> I've just rerun all previous tests from my history and all of them are
> OK. Please note however that I only did the manual build test, not through
> the whole kvm.sh script, but a diff shows that the involved files are byte
> for byte identical to those that Valentin and Mark tested, so for me that's
> OK as well.

Byte-for-byte identical works for me, thank you!

> By the way, thank you for having completed the commit messages, I hope you
> didn't spend too much time on this.

Not a problem!  I definitely had the easy end of this job.  ;-)

							Thanx, Paul