[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f4e26095-c172-cf32-cb6e-3baaf6d739cd@huawei.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2021 21:40:48 +0000
From: John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
CC: Joakim Zhang <qiangqing.zhang@....com>,
"peterz@...radead.org" <peterz@...radead.org>,
"mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
"mark.rutland@....com" <mark.rutland@....com>,
"alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com"
<alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
"jolsa@...hat.com" <jolsa@...hat.com>,
"namhyung@...nel.org" <namhyung@...nel.org>,
"irogers@...gle.com" <irogers@...gle.com>,
"kjain@...ux.ibm.com" <kjain@...ux.ibm.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linuxarm@...neuler.org" <linuxarm@...neuler.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf metricgroup: Fix system PMU metrics
On 21/01/2021 20:31, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
>> They are not normally broken like that. Normally we test beforehand, but
>> these cases were missed here by me. However if you were testing them
>> previously, then it would be expected that you had tested them again for the
>> final patchset which was merged.
>
>> Anyway, we can look to add metric tests for these.
>
>> @Arnaldo, I will send separate formal patch for this today.
> Hi John, can you please take a look at my tmp.perf/urgent branch and see
> if all is well, i.e. the versions of these patches are the ones that
> should be merged and that all the patches discussed are there?
>
> For your convenience:
>
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/acme/linux.git/log/?h=tmp.perf/urgent
Hi Arnaldo,
Yeah, that looks fine. I gave it a quick spin also without issue.
Cheers,
John
Powered by blists - more mailing lists