linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH 6/8] preempt/dynamic: Provide preempt_schedule[

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20210121222512.GA21484@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date:   Thu, 21 Jan 2021 23:25:12 +0100
From:   Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:     Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>
Cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
        Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        "Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 6/8] preempt/dynamic: Provide
 preempt_schedule[_notrace]() static calls

On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 10:58:26PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> I'm thinking the above doesn't build for !PREEMPT_DYNAMIC, given it
> relies on the STATIC_CALL unconditionally, but we only define it for
> PREEMPT_DYNAMIC:

Ooh, I see, x86 cannot get there anymore.