lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAD-N9QV7H8cRUAbnrU9KuXvKbtwL6tLk8-p6HcGpwHn3NeqHJA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 21 Jan 2021 13:37:05 +0800
From:   慕冬亮 <mudongliangabcd@...il.com>
To:     Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, jirislaby@...nel.org,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:     syzkaller-bugs <syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com>,
        syzkaller <syzkaller@...glegroups.com>
Subject: "possible deadlock in console_lock_spinning_enable" and "possible
 deadlock in console_unlock" should be duplicate crash behaviors

Dear kernel developers,

I found that on the syzbot dashboard, “possible deadlock in
console_lock_spinning_enable”[1] and "possible deadlock in
console_unlock"[2] should share the same root cause.

The reasons for the above statement:
1) the stack trace is the same, and this title difference is due to
the inline property of "console_lock_spinning_enable";
2) their PoCs are the same as each other;

If you can have any issues with this statement or our information is
useful to you, please let us know. Thanks very much.

[1] “possible deadlock in console_lock_spinning_enable” -
https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?id=2820deb61d92a8d7ab17a56ced58e963e65d76d0
[2] “possible deadlock in console_unlock” -
https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?id=39ea6caa479af471183997376dc7e90bc7d64a6a



--
My best regards to you.

     No System Is Safe!
     Dongliang Mu

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ