[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210121060522.GA23430@1wt.eu>
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2021 07:05:22 +0100
From: Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>,
Oliver Giles <ohw.giles@...il.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: Splicing to/from a tty
On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 07:38:38PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 5:45 PM Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk> wrote:
> >
> > splice() triggers an error for seekable destination with O_APPEND and
> > with NULL off_out.
>
> Ok, that's just broken.
>
> > Same for splice() to socket with
> > fcntl(sock_fd, F_SETFL, O_APPEND);
> > done first.
>
> Same.
>
> As long as you don't pass a position pointer, I think both should just work.
>
> Not that I imagine it matters for a lot of people..
I think that most users of splice() on sockets got used to falling back
to recv/send on splice failure due to various cases not being supported
historically (UNIX family sockets immediately come to my mind but I seem
to remember other combinations). Thus I guess that most users of splice()
detect that it doesn't work either due to lower than expected performance
or while running strace.
Willy
Powered by blists - more mailing lists