linux-kernel - [PATCH v2 4/4] KVM: SVM: Support #GP handling for the case of nested on nested

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 21 Jan 2021 01:55:08 -0500
From:   Wei Huang <wei.huang2@....com>
To:     kvm@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, pbonzini@...hat.com,
        vkuznets@...hat.com, mlevitsk@...hat.com, seanjc@...gle.com,
        joro@...tes.org, bp@...en8.de, tglx@...utronix.de,
        mingo@...hat.com, x86@...nel.org, jmattson@...gle.com,
        wanpengli@...cent.com, bsd@...hat.com, dgilbert@...hat.com,
        luto@...capital.net, wei.huang2@....com
Subject: [PATCH v2 4/4] KVM: SVM: Support #GP handling for the case of nested on nested

Under the case of nested on nested (e.g. L0->L1->L2->L3), #GP triggered
by SVM instructions can be hided from L1. Instead the hypervisor can
inject the proper #VMEXIT to inform L1 of what is happening. Thus L1
can avoid invoking the #GP workaround. For this reason we turns on
guest VM's X86_FEATURE_SVME_ADDR_CHK bit for KVM running inside VM to
receive the notification and change behavior.

Co-developed-by: Bandan Das <bsd@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Bandan Das <bsd@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Wei Huang <wei.huang2@....com>
---
 arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c | 19 ++++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
index 2a12870ac71a..89512c0e7663 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
@@ -2196,6 +2196,11 @@ static int svm_instr_opcode(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 
 static int emulate_svm_instr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int opcode)
 {
+	const int guest_mode_exit_codes[] = {
+		[SVM_INSTR_VMRUN] = SVM_EXIT_VMRUN,
+		[SVM_INSTR_VMLOAD] = SVM_EXIT_VMLOAD,
+		[SVM_INSTR_VMSAVE] = SVM_EXIT_VMSAVE,
+	};
 	int (*const svm_instr_handlers[])(struct vcpu_svm *svm) = {
 		[SVM_INSTR_VMRUN] = vmrun_interception,
 		[SVM_INSTR_VMLOAD] = vmload_interception,
@@ -2203,7 +2208,14 @@ static int emulate_svm_instr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int opcode)
 	};
 	struct vcpu_svm *svm = to_svm(vcpu);
 
-	return svm_instr_handlers[opcode](svm);
+	if (is_guest_mode(vcpu)) {
+		svm->vmcb->control.exit_code = guest_mode_exit_codes[opcode];
+		svm->vmcb->control.exit_info_1 = 0;
+		svm->vmcb->control.exit_info_2 = 0;
+
+		return nested_svm_vmexit(svm);
+	} else
+		return svm_instr_handlers[opcode](svm);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -4034,6 +4046,11 @@ static void svm_vcpu_after_set_cpuid(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 	/* Check again if INVPCID interception if required */
 	svm_check_invpcid(svm);
 
+	if (nested && guest_cpuid_has(vcpu, X86_FEATURE_SVM)) {
+		best = kvm_find_cpuid_entry(vcpu, 0x8000000A, 0);
+		best->edx |= (1 << 28);
+	}
+
 	/* For sev guests, the memory encryption bit is not reserved in CR3.  */
 	if (sev_guest(vcpu->kvm)) {
 		best = kvm_find_cpuid_entry(vcpu, 0x8000001F, 0);
-- 
2.27.0