linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/3] add Ebang EBAZ4205 support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <aa96fcaa362181d4b6fef9f1de0aa914@walle.cc>
Date:   Thu, 21 Jan 2021 10:35:27 +0100
From:   Michael Walle <michael@...le.cc>
To:     Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>
Cc:     devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
        soc@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] add Ebang EBAZ4205 support

Hi Michal,

Am 2021-01-21 10:25, schrieb Michal Simek:
> On 1/20/21 8:40 PM, Michael Walle wrote:
>> Add support for the Ebang EBAZ4205 board. This board was once used as 
>> a
>> control board for a bitcoin mining device. Nowawdays it is sold as a 
>> cheap
>> Zynq-7000 eval board.
>> 
>> Michael Walle (3):
>>   dt-bindings: add ebang vendor prefix
>>   dt-bindings: arm: add Ebang EBAZ4205 board
>>   ARM: dts: add Ebang EBAZ4205 device tree
>> 
>>  .../devicetree/bindings/arm/xilinx.yaml       |   1 +
>>  .../devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.yaml  |   2 +
>>  arch/arm/boot/dts/Makefile                    |   1 +
>>  arch/arm/boot/dts/zynq-ebaz4205.dts           | 109 
>> ++++++++++++++++++
>>  4 files changed, 113 insertions(+)
>>  create mode 100644 arch/arm/boot/dts/zynq-ebaz4205.dts
>> 
> 
> any link with schematics?

https://github.com/xjtuecho/EBAZ4205, looks like these are
reverse engineered (from a layout file?) though.

> I will let dt guys to comment 1/3 but series look good to me.
> The board doesn't look interesting from description point of view 
> that's
> why all the time thinking if makes sense to add it to kernel.

What do you want to tell me? That for the time being, it didn't
appear to you to add the board yourself - or do you thing it
doesn't make sense at all. If its the latter, what would be
actual reason to have a board in mainline?

-michael